On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 10:42:46AM -0700, Jonathan Tan wrote:
> On 04/01/2017 09:18 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 12:03:44PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > The logic is fairly simple: if we encounter an empty line, and we have
> > > pending in-body headers, we flush the pend
Thanks, everyone, for looking into this.
On 04/01/2017 09:18 PM, Jeff King wrote:
On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 12:03:44PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
The logic is fairly simple: if we encounter an empty line, and we have
pending in-body headers, we flush the pending headers, and mark us as
no longe
Linus Torvalds writes:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
>>
>> The continuation logic is oddly complex, and I can't follow the logic.
>> But it is completely broken in how it thinks empty lines are somehow
>> "continuations".
>
> The attached patch seems to work for me.
On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 12:03:44PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
> >
> > The continuation logic is oddly complex, and I can't follow the logic.
> > But it is completely broken in how it thinks empty lines are somehow
> > "continuations".
>
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> The continuation logic is oddly complex, and I can't follow the logic.
> But it is completely broken in how it thinks empty lines are somehow
> "continuations".
The attached patch seems to work for me. Comments?
The logic is fairly simpl
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 05:52:00PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Ok, did a bisect, and this bisects to commit 6b4b013f1884 ("mailinfo:
> handle in-body header continuations").
>
> The continuation logic is oddly complex, and I can't follow the logic.
> But it is completely broken in how it think
Ok, did a bisect, and this bisects to commit 6b4b013f1884 ("mailinfo:
handle in-body header continuations").
The continuation logic is oddly complex, and I can't follow the logic.
But it is completely broken in how it thinks empty lines are somehow
"continuations".
Jonathan?
Try applying the attached patch with
git am 0001-Test-patch.patch
in the git repository.
At least for me, it results in a very odd commit that has one single
line in the commit message:
Test patch This should go in the body not in the subject line
which is obviously bogus.
I think the
8 matches
Mail list logo