On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:12:39AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> In any case, lest we forget...
>
> -- >8 --
> Subject: [PATCH] t3404: use write_script
Yep, looks good. Thanks.
-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 09:58:20AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Looks good and is the minimal change. I kind of wonder if the example
> > would be more clear, though, as just:
> >
> > write_script .git/hooks/pre-commit <<-\EOF &&
> > exit 1
> > EOF
> > echo whatever >file1 &&
> >
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Jeff King writes:
> ...
>> Looks good and is the minimal change. I kind of wonder if the example
>> would be more clear, though, as just:
>>
>> write_script .git/hooks/pre-commit <<-\EOF &&
>> exit 1
>> EOF
>> echo whatever
Jeff King writes:
> On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 05:37:43PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh b/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh
>> index b79f442..d96d0e4 100755
>> --- a/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh
>> +++ b/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh
>> @@
On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 05:37:43PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> diff --git a/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh b/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh
> index b79f442..d96d0e4 100755
> --- a/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh
> +++ b/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh
> @@ -555,10 +555,9 @@ test_expect_success
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 12:01:30PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > diff --git a/t/t1020-subdirectory.sh b/t/t1020-subdirectory.sh
> > index 8e22b03..6dedb1c 100755
> > --- a/t/t1020-subdirectory.sh
> > +++ b/t/t1020-subdirectory.sh
> > @@ -142,9 +142,9 @@ test_expect_success 'GIT_PREFIX for
Eric Sunshine writes:
>> with "printf". The output from the latter is compared with an
>> expected output, again prepared with "printf" hance lacking the
>
> s/hance/hence/
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Subject: t1020: do not overuse printf and use write_script
>
> The test prepares a sample file "dir/two" with a single incomplete
> line in it with "printf", and also prepares a small helper script
> "diff" to create a
Junio C Hamano writes:
> I looked at
>
> $ git grep -c '#! */bin/sh' t | grep -v ':1$'
>
> and did a few just for fun. Doing it fully may be a good
> microproject for next year ;-)
>
> t/t1020-subdirectory.sh | 6 +++---
> t/t2050-git-dir-relative.sh | 11
Jeff King writes:
> Hmm. t3404.40 does this:
>
> echo "#!/bin/sh" > $PRE_COMMIT &&
> echo "test -z \"\$(git diff --cached --check)\"" >>$PRE_COMMIT &&
> chmod a+x $PRE_COMMIT &&
>
> So I'm pretty sure that $PRE_COMMIT script should be barfing each time
> it is
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 12:29:45AM +0200, Tom G. Christensen wrote:
> On 09/04/16 23:04, Jeff King wrote:
> >I did some quick grepping around, and I suspect you may run
> >into the same thing in other places (e.g., t3404.40 looks
> >like a similar case).
>
> There are only a few tests that fail
On 09/04/16 23:04, Jeff King wrote:
I did some quick grepping around, and I suspect you may run
into the same thing in other places (e.g., t3404.40 looks
like a similar case).
There are only a few tests that fail and just t5532.3 seems affected by
this issue.
Subject: [PATCH] t5532: use
On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 10:27:37PM +0200, Tom G. Christensen wrote:
> Looking at the testsuite results on Solaris I see a failure in t5532.3.
>
> Running the testsuite with -v -i revealed a shell syntax error:
>
> proxying for example.com 9418
> ./proxy: syntax error at line 3: `cmd=$'
Hello,
Looking at the testsuite results on Solaris I see a failure in t5532.3.
Running the testsuite with -v -i revealed a shell syntax error:
proxying for example.com 9418
./proxy: syntax error at line 3: `cmd=$' unexpected
not ok 3 - fetch through proxy works
#
# git fetch fake
14 matches
Mail list logo