On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 06:57:45PM +0200, Armin Kunaschik wrote:
> > Right. Any modern-ish Bourne shell will do, so moving to bash is one
> > way to fix it.
>
> My last compile of git 2.2.2 did far better than the current 2.8.2. So
> it looks like there were more recent changes that broke portabi
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 08:17:38PM +0200, Armin Kunaschik wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to compile/test/use git 2.8.2 on AIX 6.1 with no bash available.
>> /bin/sh is a hard link to /bin/ksh which is a ksh88, a posix shell.
>> Is this supposed to work?
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 08:17:38PM +0200, Armin Kunaschik wrote:
> I'm trying to compile/test/use git 2.8.2 on AIX 6.1 with no bash available.
> /bin/sh is a hard link to /bin/ksh which is a ksh88, a posix shell.
> Is this supposed to work?
We aim for a practical subset of Bourne shells, includin
On 04.05.16 20:17, Armin Kunaschik wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm trying to compile/test/use git 2.8.2 on AIX 6.1 with no bash available.
> /bin/sh is a hard link to /bin/ksh which is a ksh88, a posix shell.
> Is this supposed to work?
>
> As an example: make test fails on nearly every t34* test and o
Hi list,
I'm trying to compile/test/use git 2.8.2 on AIX 6.1 with no bash available.
/bin/sh is a hard link to /bin/ksh which is a ksh88, a posix shell.
Is this supposed to work?
As an example: make test fails on nearly every t34* test and on tests
which contain rebase.
The installation of bash (
5 matches
Mail list logo