RE: [BUG] test_must_fail: does not correctly detect failures - Was Git 2.16.0-rc2 Test Summary on NonStop

2018-01-15 Thread Randall S. Becker
On January 15, 2018 10:01 PM, brian m. Carlson wrote: > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 09:25:37AM -0500, Randall S. Becker wrote: > > On January 15, 2018 2:06 AM, Johannes Sixt wrote: > > > I take "die exits with non-zero" as a piece of information for the > > > *users* so that they can write "if perl

Re: [BUG] test_must_fail: does not correctly detect failures - Was Git 2.16.0-rc2 Test Summary on NonStop

2018-01-15 Thread brian m. carlson
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 09:25:37AM -0500, Randall S. Becker wrote: > On January 15, 2018 2:06 AM, Johannes Sixt wrote: > > I take "die exits with non-zero" as a piece of information for the > > *users* so that they can write "if perl foo.pl; then something; fi" in shell > > scripts. I do *not*

RE: [BUG] test_must_fail: does not correctly detect failures - Was Git 2.16.0-rc2 Test Summary on NonStop

2018-01-15 Thread Randall S. Becker
On January 15, 2018 2:06 AM, Johannes Sixt wrote: > Am 15.01.2018 um 03:37 schrieb Randall S. Becker: > > On January 14, 2018 4:33 PM, I wrote: > >> The exotic error code coming back from perl is 162. I can muck with > >> it, if there was a value more useful to git. > >> * 553 } else if

Re: [BUG] test_must_fail: does not correctly detect failures - Was Git 2.16.0-rc2 Test Summary on NonStop

2018-01-14 Thread Johannes Sixt
Am 15.01.2018 um 03:37 schrieb Randall S. Becker: On January 14, 2018 4:33 PM, I wrote: The exotic error code coming back from perl is 162. I can muck with it, if there was a value more useful to git. * 553 } else if (WIFEXITED(status)) { * 554 code =

RE: [BUG] test_must_fail: does not correctly detect failures - Was Git 2.16.0-rc2 Test Summary on NonStop

2018-01-14 Thread Randall S. Becker
On January 14, 2018 4:33 PM, I wrote: > On January 14, 2018 1:41 PM Johannes Sixt wrote: > > Sent: > > Am 14.01.2018 um 17:50 schrieb Randall S. Becker: > > > Follow-up: This looks like the completion code from perl on NonStop > > > is not the same as expected by git in the case of failures. I

RE: [BUG] test_must_fail: does not correctly detect failures - Was Git 2.16.0-rc2 Test Summary on NonStop

2018-01-14 Thread Randall S. Becker
> -Original Message- > From: Johannes Sixt [mailto:j...@kdbg.org] > Sent: On January 14, 2018 1:41 PM wrote: > Am 14.01.2018 um 17:50 schrieb Randall S. Becker: > > Follow-up: This looks like the completion code from perl on NonStop is > > not the same as expected by git in the case of

Re: [BUG] test_must_fail: does not correctly detect failures - Was Git 2.16.0-rc2 Test Summary on NonStop

2018-01-14 Thread Johannes Sixt
Am 14.01.2018 um 17:50 schrieb Randall S. Becker: Follow-up: This looks like the completion code from perl on NonStop is not the same as expected by git in the case of failures. I need to debug this to get more details to the team. We have had completion issues before relating to interpretation

RE: [BUG] test_must_fail: does not correctly detect failures - Was Git 2.16.0-rc2 Test Summary on NonStop

2018-01-14 Thread Randall S. Becker
On January 13, 2018 3:17 PM, I wrote: > On January 13, 2018 2:31 PM, I wrote: > > On January 13, 2018 1:08 PM, I wrote: > > > Here’s where things are. This is probably the best git release so > > > far > > (ever). > > > After applying a4cdf02, I had 6 total breakages. 3 existing, 3 new. > > > Many