On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 09:54:19PM +, David Turner wrote:
>
> > I dunno. The code path you are changing _only_ affects anything if the
> > http.emptyauth config is set. But I guess I just don't understand why you
> > would say "http://@gitserver; in the first place. Is that a common thing?
>
David Turner writes:
>> > > I dunno. The code path you are changing _only_ affects anything if
>> > > the http.emptyauth config is set. But I guess I just don't
>> > > understand why you would say "http://@gitserver; in the first place.
>> Is that a common thing?
>> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff King [mailto:p...@peff.net]
> Sent: Monday, October 03, 2016 5:59 PM
> To: David Turner
> Cc: git@vger.kernel.org; sand...@crustytoothpaste.net
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] http: http.emptyauth should allow empty (not just
> NULL) username
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 09:54:19PM +, David Turner wrote:
> > I dunno. The code path you are changing _only_ affects anything if the
> > http.emptyauth config is set. But I guess I just don't understand why you
> > would say "http://@gitserver; in the first place. Is that a common thing?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff King [mailto:p...@peff.net]
> Sent: Monday, October 03, 2016 5:01 PM
> To: David Turner
> Cc: git@vger.kernel.org; sand...@crustytoothpaste.net
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] http: http.emptyauth should allow empty (not just
> NULL) username
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 01:19:28PM -0400, David Turner wrote:
> When using kerberos authentication, one URL pattern which is
> allowed is http://@gitserver.example.com. This leads to a username
> of zero-length, rather than a NULL username. But the two cases
> should be treated the same by
6 matches
Mail list logo