On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Kevin Willford wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 02:28:28PM -0600, Kevin Willford wrote:
>>
>> > The return value of the get_files_dirs call is never being used.
>> > Looking at the history of the file and it was originally only
>> > being used for debug output
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 03:58:00PM +, Kevin Willford wrote:
> > > The return value of the get_files_dirs call is never being used.
> > > Looking at the history of the file and it was originally only
> > > being used for debug output statements. Also when
> > > read_tree_recursive return value
>
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 02:28:28PM -0600, Kevin Willford wrote:
>
> > The return value of the get_files_dirs call is never being used.
> > Looking at the history of the file and it was originally only
> > being used for debug output statements. Also when
> > read_tree_recursive return value
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 06:45:29PM -0400, Ben Peart wrote:
> > Since the debug output has been removed and the caller isn't
> > checking the return value there is no reason to keep calulating
> > and returning a value.
> >
>
> Did a quick search and you're right, nothing is using the return valu
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 02:28:28PM -0600, Kevin Willford wrote:
> The return value of the get_files_dirs call is never being used.
> Looking at the history of the file and it was originally only
> being used for debug output statements. Also when
> read_tree_recursive return value is non zero it
On 8/28/2017 4:28 PM, Kevin Willford wrote:
The return value of the get_files_dirs call is never being used.
Looking at the history of the file and it was originally only
being used for debug output statements. Also when
read_tree_recursive return value is non zero it is changed to
zero. This
6 matches
Mail list logo
