On Thu, Sep 27 2018, Derrick Stolee wrote:
> On 9/27/2018 11:21 AM, Ben Peart wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 9/26/2018 2:54 PM, Derrick Stolee wrote:
>>>
>>> GIT_TEST_INDEX_THREADS=1
>>>
>>
>> Because the test repos are so small (ie smaller than 10K files), the
>> test suite already executes as if
On 9/27/2018 11:21 AM, Ben Peart wrote:
On 9/26/2018 2:54 PM, Derrick Stolee wrote:
GIT_TEST_INDEX_THREADS=1
Because the test repos are so small (ie smaller than 10K files), the
test suite already executes as if GIT_TEST_INDEX_THREADS=1 is set (ie
single threaded). I added the test
On 9/26/2018 2:54 PM, Derrick Stolee wrote:
On 9/26/2018 2:43 PM, Thomas Gummerer wrote:
On 09/26, Derrick Stolee wrote:
This is a bit tricky to do, but I will investigate. For some things, the
values can conflict with each other (GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX doesn't play
nicely with other index
On 9/27/2018 11:14 AM, Ben Peart wrote:
On 9/26/2018 2:44 PM, Derrick Stolee wrote:
On 9/26/2018 1:59 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Derrick Stolee writes:
Perhaps removing the middle columns of data and just " )
" would be easier? We could also remove tabs to save space. For
example:
On 9/26/2018 2:44 PM, Derrick Stolee wrote:
On 9/26/2018 1:59 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Derrick Stolee writes:
In an effort to ensure new code is reasonably covered by the test
suite, we now have contrib/coverage-diff.sh to combine the gcov output
from 'make coverage-test ; make
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 11:44 AM Derrick Stolee wrote:
> c3b9bc94b9b (Elijah Newren 2018-09-05 10:03:07 -0700
> 181)options.filter = xstrdup(value);
I blame Duy; he was the one who wanted me to look for and remove stray
semicolons in additional places[1]. ;-)
All joking aside,
On 9/26/2018 2:43 PM, Thomas Gummerer wrote:
On 09/26, Derrick Stolee wrote:
This is a bit tricky to do, but I will investigate. For some things, the
values can conflict with each other (GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX doesn't play
nicely with other index options, I think).
Just commenting on this point.
On 9/26/2018 1:59 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Derrick Stolee writes:
In an effort to ensure new code is reasonably covered by the test
suite, we now have contrib/coverage-diff.sh to combine the gcov output
from 'make coverage-test ; make coverage-report' with the output from
'git diff A B' to
On 09/26, Derrick Stolee wrote:
> This is a bit tricky to do, but I will investigate. For some things, the
> values can conflict with each other (GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX doesn't play
> nicely with other index options, I think).
Just commenting on this point. I think all the index options should
be
Derrick Stolee writes:
> In an effort to ensure new code is reasonably covered by the test
> suite, we now have contrib/coverage-diff.sh to combine the gcov output
> from 'make coverage-test ; make coverage-report' with the output from
> 'git diff A B' to discover _new_ lines of code that are
> -Original Message-
> From: Derrick Stolee
> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 6:43 AM
>
> On 9/25/2018 5:12 PM, Ben Peart wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 9/25/2018 2:42 PM, Derrick Stolee wrote:
> >> In an effort to ensure new code is reasonably covered by the test
> >> suite, we now have
On 9/26/2018 6:56 AM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Derrick Stolee
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 6:43 AM
On 9/25/2018 5:12 PM, Ben Peart wrote:
On 9/25/2018 2:42 PM, Derrick Stolee wrote:
In an effort to ensure new code is reasonably covered by the test
suite, we
On 9/25/2018 5:12 PM, Ben Peart wrote:
On 9/25/2018 2:42 PM, Derrick Stolee wrote:
In an effort to ensure new code is reasonably covered by the test
suite, we now have contrib/coverage-diff.sh to combine the gcov
output from 'make coverage-test ; make coverage-report' with the
output from
On 9/25/2018 2:42 PM, Derrick Stolee wrote:
In an effort to ensure new code is reasonably covered by the test suite,
we now have contrib/coverage-diff.sh to combine the gcov output from
'make coverage-test ; make coverage-report' with the output from 'git
diff A B' to discover _new_ lines
14 matches
Mail list logo
