On 12/13, Lars Schneider wrote:
>
> > On 13 Dec 2017, at 18:38, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> > Lars Schneider writes:
> >
> >> I think your solution points into the right direction.
> >> Right now we have the following test matrix:
> >>
> >> 1.
On 12/12, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Thomas Gummerer writes:
>
> >
> > The breakages wen the split-index code fails tend to break things in
> > much more obvious manners than a wrong message, usually git ends up
> > dying if it gets broken. Both of the bugs that were fixed
> On 13 Dec 2017, at 18:38, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> Lars Schneider writes:
>
>> I think your solution points into the right direction.
>> Right now we have the following test matrix:
>>
>> 1. Linux - clang
>> 2. Linux - gcc
>> 3. Mac - clang
>>
Lars Schneider writes:
> I think your solution points into the right direction.
> Right now we have the following test matrix:
>
> 1. Linux - clang
> 2. Linux - gcc
> 3. Mac - clang
> 4. Mac - gcc
> 5. Linux - gcc - GET_TEXT_POISION
> 6. Linux - gcc - 32bit
> 7. Windows
> On 12 Dec 2017, at 20:15, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> Lars Schneider writes:
>
>>> You're right, it's my first time using travis CI and I got confused
>>> about how the .travis.yml works, thanks for catching that. Will
>>> re-phrase the commit
Thomas Gummerer writes:
>
> The breakages wen the split-index code fails tend to break things in
> much more obvious manners than a wrong message, usually git ends up
> dying if it gets broken. Both of the bugs that were fixed here would
> have been caught with the change
On 12/12, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Lars Schneider writes:
>
> >> You're right, it's my first time using travis CI and I got confused
> >> about how the .travis.yml works, thanks for catching that. Will
> >> re-phrase the commit message.
> >
> > Szeder is spot on. If you
Lars Schneider writes:
>> You're right, it's my first time using travis CI and I got confused
>> about how the .travis.yml works, thanks for catching that. Will
>> re-phrase the commit message.
>
> Szeder is spot on. If you fix up the message, then this patch looks
>
> On 11 Dec 2017, at 22:42, Thomas Gummerer wrote:
>
> On 12/11, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
>>> Make sure that split index doesn't get broken, by running it on travis
>>> CI.
>>>
>>> Run the test suite with split index enabled in linux 64 bit mode, and
>>> leave split index
On 12/11, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
> > Make sure that split index doesn't get broken, by running it on travis
> > CI.
> >
> > Run the test suite with split index enabled in linux 64 bit mode, and
> > leave split index turned off in 32-bit mode.
>
> This doesn't accurately describe what the patch
> Make sure that split index doesn't get broken, by running it on travis
> CI.
>
> Run the test suite with split index enabled in linux 64 bit mode, and
> leave split index turned off in 32-bit mode.
This doesn't accurately describe what the patch does.
Travis CI runs three 64 bit Linux build
On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Thomas Gummerer wrote:
> Make sure that split index doesn't get broken, by running it on travis
> CI.
>
> Run the test suite with split index enabled in linux 64 bit mode, and
> leave split index turned off in 32-bit mode. The laternative
12 matches
Mail list logo