Thomas Rast t...@thomasrast.ch wrote:
Please take a closer look at the last two test cases that specify the
expected behaviour of rebasing a branch that tracks the empty tree.
At this point they expect the Nothing to do error (aborts with
untouched history). This is consistent with rebasing
Hi Fabian
Impressive analysis!
Concerning the bugfix: Obviously, the patch misuses the `squash_onto`
flag because it assumes that the new base is empty except for the
sentinel commit. The variable name does not imply anything close to
that. An additional flag to disable the use of the
2 matches
Mail list logo
