Hi Sven & Junio,
On Thu, 15 Oct 2015, Sven Helmberger wrote:
> Am 14.10.2015 um 19:50 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
> > Sven Helmberger writes:
> >
> > As a quick-and-dirty change, you could invent a new variant of
> > 's'plit that breaks a N-line hunk into N hunks with
Hi Sven,
On Thu, 15 Oct 2015, Sven Helmberger wrote:
> Am 15.10.2015 um 12:11 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
> >
> > This is all technically sound. From a usability perspective I would wish
> > more for a way to exclude or filter the lines by a pattern.
>
> Why not do both?
Because sometimes
Am 15.10.2015 um 17:06 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
>
> Because sometimes more is less. If users are overwhelmed with many, many
> options, they are *less* likely to benefit from the few that are easy to
> use because they won't find out about them.
>
Going from "I want to split at 'x'" to
Am 15.10.2015 um 12:11 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
>
> This is all technically sound. From a usability perspective I would wish
> more for a way to exclude or filter the lines by a pattern.
Why not do both?
The only thing that is unfortunate is that the "/" already is a command.
Which would
Hi Sven,
On 2015-10-14 17:07, Sven Helmberger wrote:
> What I then often encountered was the situation where I happened to have
> inserted consecutive lines of code that conceptually belong to different
> commits. Normally I can nicely split patches, but not in this case,
> making manually
Sven Helmberger writes:
> I hope this hasn't been discussed before.
>
> I'm a big fan of cleanliness in commits and therefore often use git add
> --patch to sort code changes I made into the right commits etc.
>
> What I then often encountered was the situation where I
Sven Helmberger writes:
> Hello,
>
> I hope this hasn't been discussed before.
>
> I'm a big fan of cleanliness in commits and therefore often use git add
> --patch to sort code changes I made into the right commits etc.
>
> What I then often encountered was the situation
Am 14.10.2015 um 19:50 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
> Sven Helmberger writes:
>
> As a quick-and-dirty change, you could invent a new variant of
> 's'plit that breaks a N-line hunk into N hunks with 1-line each, but
> obviously that would not be a pleasant-enough UI to be
8 matches
Mail list logo