On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 10:25:16 -0400
Jeff Hostetler wrote:
> >> Perhaps you could augment the OID lookup to remember where the object
> >> was found (essentially a .promisor bit set). Then you wouldn't need
> >> to touch them all.
> >
> > Sorry - I don't understand this.
On 9/22/2017 6:58 PM, Jonathan Tan wrote:
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 17:32:00 -0400
Jeff Hostetler wrote:
I guess I'm afraid that the first call to is_promised() is going
cause a very long pause as it loads up a very large hash of objects.
Yes, the first call will cause a
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 17:32:00 -0400
Jeff Hostetler wrote:
> I guess I'm afraid that the first call to is_promised() is going
> cause a very long pause as it loads up a very large hash of objects.
Yes, the first call will cause a long pause. (I think fsck and gc can
On 9/21/2017 7:04 PM, Jonathan Tan wrote:
On Thu, 21 Sep 2017 14:00:40 -0400
Jeff Hostetler wrote:
(part 3)
Additional overall comments on:
https://github.com/jonathantanmy/git/commits/partialclone2
{} WRT the code in is_promised() [1]
[1]
On Thu, 21 Sep 2017 14:00:40 -0400
Jeff Hostetler wrote:
> (part 3)
>
> Additional overall comments on:
> https://github.com/jonathantanmy/git/commits/partialclone2
>
> {} WRT the code in is_promised() [1]
>
> [1]
>
(part 3)
Additional overall comments on:
https://github.com/jonathantanmy/git/commits/partialclone2
{} WRT the code in is_promised() [1]
[1]
https://github.com/jonathantanmy/git/commit/7a9c2d9b6e2fce293817b595dee29a7eede0#diff-5d5d5dc185ef37dc30bb7d9a7ae0c4e8R1960
{} it looked like it
6 matches
Mail list logo