Re: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2019, #01; Thu, 3)

2019-10-05 Thread Junio C Hamano
Phillip Wood writes: >> * ra/rebase-i-more-options (2019-09-09) 6 commits >> ... >> Is this ready for 'next'. > > Nearly, but not quite I think cf [1]. Also I'm still not convinced > that having different behaviors for --ignore-whitespace depending on > the backend is going to be helpful but ma

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2019, #01; Thu, 3)

2019-10-05 Thread Phillip Wood
Hi Elijah On 05/10/2019 01:40, Elijah Newren wrote: On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 4:49 AM Phillip Wood wrote: Hi Junio On 03/10/2019 06:04, Junio C Hamano wrote: Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with '-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with '

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2019, #01; Thu, 3)

2019-10-04 Thread Elijah Newren
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 4:49 AM Phillip Wood wrote: > > Hi Junio > > On 03/10/2019 06:04, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with > > '-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with > > '+' are in 'next'. The ones marked with

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2019, #01; Thu, 3)

2019-10-04 Thread Phillip Wood
Hi Junio On 03/10/2019 06:04, Junio C Hamano wrote: Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with '-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with '+' are in 'next'. The ones marked with '.' do not appear in any of the integration branches, but I am still

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2019, #01; Thu, 3)

2019-10-03 Thread Junio C Hamano
Elijah Newren writes: > Actually, René posted a code cleanup suggestion for patch 2/8, so I > sent a V3 re-roll[1]. Could you pick up V3 instead of merging V2 down > to next? > > [1] https://public-inbox.org/git/20191003202709.26279-1-new...@gmail.com/ Thanks for stopping me. Will take a look.

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2019, #01; Thu, 3)

2019-10-03 Thread Junio C Hamano
Emily Shaffer writes: > On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 02:04:39PM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with >> '-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with >> '+' are in 'next'. The ones marked with '.' do not appear in any

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2019, #01; Thu, 3)

2019-10-03 Thread Elijah Newren
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 10:22 PM Junio C Hamano wrote: > > * en/fast-imexport-nested-tags (2019-10-02) 8 commits > - fast-export: handle nested tags > - t9350: add tests for tags of things other than a commit > - fast-export: allow user to request tags be marked with --mark-tags > - fast-export

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2019, #01; Thu, 3)

2019-10-03 Thread Emily Shaffer
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 02:04:39PM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with > '-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with > '+' are in 'next'. The ones marked with '.' do not appear in any of > the integration branche