Re: merge --no-commit not able to report stats more verbosely?

2012-10-29 Thread Phil Hord
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote: On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 09:39:31AM -0400, Scott R. Godin wrote: As you can see from the below, I can't seem to get it to give me more verbose results of what's being merged (as in the actual merge below) with --stat or -v .. is

Re: merge --no-commit not able to report stats more verbosely?

2012-10-28 Thread Jeff King
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 09:39:31AM -0400, Scott R. Godin wrote: As you can see from the below, I can't seem to get it to give me more verbose results of what's being merged (as in the actual merge below) with --stat or -v .. is it supposed to do that? Yes. The diffstat is shown for the

Re: merge --no-commit not able to report stats more verbosely?

2012-10-26 Thread Scott R. Godin
Looks like I got lost in the press of other issues. anyone? On 10/22/2012 09:39 AM, Scott R. Godin wrote: As you can see from the below, I can't seem to get it to give me more verbose results of what's being merged (as in the actual merge below) with --stat or -v .. is it supposed to do that?