From: "anatoly techtonik"
From: Philip Oakley
> So if I understand correctly, the hope is that `git show-ref --tags`
> could
> get an alternate option `--all-tags` [proper option name required...]
> such
> that the user would not have to develop the rather over the complicated
> expression th
t; wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Randall S. Becker
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 2017-11-23 02:31 (GMT-05:00) anatoly techtonik wrote
>>>>>
>>>>> Subject: Re: Unify annotated and non-annotated tags
>>>
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 5:06 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Igor Djordjevic writes:
>
>> If you would like to mimic output of "git show-ref", repeating
>> commits for each tag pointing to it and showing full tag name as
>> well, you could do something like this, for example:
>>
>> for tag in $
anatoly techtonik writes:
>> Git is not doomed to preserve anything forever. We've gradually broken
>> backwards compatibility for a few core things like these.
>>
>> However, just as a bystander reading this thread I haven't seen any
>> compelling reason for why these should be removed. You init
onik wrote
Subject: Re: Unify annotated and non-annotated tags
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 5:06 AM, Junio C Hamano
wrote:
Igor Djordjevic writes:
If you would like to mimic output of "git show-ref", repeating
commits for each tag pointing to it and showing full tag name as
well, you cou
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 1:24 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 10:52 AM, anatoly techtonik
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Randall S. Becker
>> wrote:
>>> On 2017-11-23 02:31 (GMT-05:00) anatoly techtonik wrote
>>>&
On November 24, 2017 4:52 AM anatoly techtonik wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Randall S. Becker
>wrote:
>> On 2017-11-23 02:31 (GMT-05:00) anatoly techtonik wrote
>>>Subject: Re: Unify annotated and non-annotated tags On Sat, Nov 11,
>>>2017 at
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 10:52 AM, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Randall S. Becker
> wrote:
>> On 2017-11-23 02:31 (GMT-05:00) anatoly techtonik wrote
>>>Subject: Re: Unify annotated and non-annotated tags
>>>On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Randall S. Becker
wrote:
> On 2017-11-23 02:31 (GMT-05:00) anatoly techtonik wrote
>>Subject: Re: Unify annotated and non-annotated tags
>>On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 5:06 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>> Igor Djordjevic writes:
>>>
Am 23.11.2017 um 16:08 schrieb Randall S. Becker:
[...]
>> So my proposal is to get rid of non-annotated tags, so to get all
>> tags with commits that they point to, one would use:
>> git for-each-ref --format='%(*objectname) %(refname)' refs/tags>
>> For so-called non-annotated tags just leave t
On 2017-11-23 02:31 (GMT-05:00) anatoly techtonik wrote
>Subject: Re: Unify annotated and non-annotated tags
>On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 5:06 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Igor Djordjevic writes:
>>
>>> If you would like to mimic output of "git show-ref", repeat
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 5:06 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Igor Djordjevic writes:
>
>> If you would like to mimic output of "git show-ref", repeating
>> commits for each tag pointing to it and showing full tag name as
>> well, you could do something like this, for example:
>>
>> for tag in $
On 11/11/2017 03:06, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Igor Djordjevic writes:
>
>> If you would like to mimic output of "git show-ref", repeating
>> commits for each tag pointing to it and showing full tag name as
>> well, you could do something like this, for example:
>>
>> for tag in $(git for-e
Igor Djordjevic writes:
> If you would like to mimic output of "git show-ref", repeating
> commits for each tag pointing to it and showing full tag name as
> well, you could do something like this, for example:
>
> for tag in $(git for-each-ref --format="%(refname)" refs/tags)
> do
Hi Anatoly,
On 10/11/2017 11:58, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> It is hard to work with Git tags, because on low level hash
> of non-annotated tag is pointing to commit, but hash for
> annotated tag is pointing to tag metadata.
>
> On low level that means that there is no way to get commit
> hash fro
Hi,
It is hard to work with Git tags, because on low level hash
of non-annotated tag is pointing to commit, but hash for
annotated tag is pointing to tag metadata.
On low level that means that there is no way to get commit
hash from tag in a single step. If tag is annotated, you need
to find and
16 matches
Mail list logo
