Re: Unify subcommand structure; introduce double dashes for all subcommands?

On 10.08.2014 20:13, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Stefan Beller writes: > >> On 23.07.2014 19:52, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >>> Sounds familiar. E.g. here is a similar thread about a year ago. >>> >>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/231376/focus=231478 >>> >>> Further discussi

Re: Unify subcommand structure; introduce double dashes for all subcommands?

Stefan Beller writes: > On 23.07.2014 19:52, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Sounds familiar. E.g. here is a similar thread about a year ago. >> >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/231376/focus=231478 >> >> Further discussions to make the plan more concrete is very much >> w

Re: Unify subcommand structure; introduce double dashes for all subcommands?

On 23.07.2014 19:52, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Stefan Beller writes: > >> A git command is generally setup as: >> git [] [] ... >> >> The subcommands vary wildly by the nature of the command. However all >> subcommands >> could at least follow one style. The commands bundle, notes, stash and

Re: Unify subcommand structure; introduce double dashes for all subcommands?

Stefan Beller writes: > A git command is generally setup as: > git [] [] ... > > The subcommands vary wildly by the nature of the command. However all > subcommands > could at least follow one style. The commands bundle, notes, stash and > submodule > have subcommands without two leading d

Unify subcommand structure; introduce double dashes for all subcommands?

In the user survey 2012 question 23 ("In your opinion, which areas in Git need improvement?"), the most crucial point identified was the user interface. I wonder if there are any more recent surveys, showing if this has changed. Now when we want to improve the user interface, we're likely talking a