On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 06:19:23PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King writes:
>
> > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 03:50:14PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> >> * jk/upload-pack-hook (2016-05-24) 6 commits
> >> - upload-pack: provide a hook for running pack-objects
> >> - config: add a notio
Jeff King writes:
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 03:50:14PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> * jk/upload-pack-hook (2016-05-24) 6 commits
>> - upload-pack: provide a hook for running pack-objects
>> - config: add a notion of "scope"
>> - config: return configset value for current_config_ functions
Jeff King writes:
> I just sent a replacement for the fourth patch that avoids the t/helper
> problem. It's probably worth dealing with before even hitting "next" so
> as not to break bisection.
>
> You should probably hold off on merging the top one. The discussion
> stalled because I was on vac
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 03:50:14PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> * jk/upload-pack-hook (2016-05-24) 6 commits
> - upload-pack: provide a hook for running pack-objects
> - config: add a notion of "scope"
> - config: return configset value for current_config_ functions
> - config: set up config
Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with
'-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with
'+' are in 'next'. The ones marked with '.' do not appear in any of
the integration branches, but I am still holding onto them.
You can find the changes described
5 matches
Mail list logo
