Re: git-clone ignores umask for working tree

2012-07-06 Thread Daniel Barkalow
On Fri, 6 Jul 2012, Alex Riesen wrote: > Hi list, > > when git-clone was built in, its treatment of umask has changed: the shell > version respected umask for newly created directories by using plain mkdir(1), > and the builtin version just uses mkdir(work_tree, 0755). > > Is it intentional? I h

git-clone ignores umask for working tree

2012-07-06 Thread Alex Riesen
Hi list, when git-clone was built in, its treatment of umask has changed: the shell version respected umask for newly created directories by using plain mkdir(1), and the builtin version just uses mkdir(work_tree, 0755). Is it intentional? This Stackoverflow question is what got me interested: