[PATCH 2/2] Make git-update-cache take relative pathnames

This also makes ./filename acceptable as a side effect, since the pathname normalization handles that too. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- update-cache.c |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) ece92eeda777c3141f5692132ccc2ba7e4e801a2 diff --git

Re: Why is there no git-update-cache --modified (aka I give up)

Dear diary, on Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 07:52:18AM CEST, I got a letter where Marc Singer [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... # git-diff-cache HEAD is really nice. But, do I really have to invoke git-update-cache with every modified file? I could write a script to cul the filenames from git

Re: Why is there no git-update-cache --modified (aka I give up)

Marc Singer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: # git-diff-cache HEAD is really nice. But, do I really have to invoke git-update-cache with every modified file? I could write a script to cul the filenames from git-diff-cache, but I'm having a hard time believing that that is how others

Re: Why is there no git-update-cache --modified (aka I give up)

On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 01:14:24AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: Marc Singer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: # git-diff-cache HEAD is really nice. But, do I really have to invoke git-update-cache with every modified file? I could write a script to cul the filenames from git-diff-cache

Re: Why is there no git-update-cache --modified (aka I give up)

Matthias Urlichs smurf at smurf.noris.de writes: Hi, Marc Singer wrote: # git-update-cache `git-diff-cache | cut -f2` g-d-c should have an option to print file names only. All that cutting and argument-backtick-ing gets pretty nasty when there are a lot of files, or if they contain

Re: git-update-cache:

On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 12:42:20AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: I receive the following error: git-update-cache: symbol lookup error: git-update-cache: undefined symbol: deflateBound open(/usr/lib/libz.so.1, O_RDONLY)= 3 This is the reason. For a strange reason when