On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 03:11 +, Eric Wong wrote:
> How would discussion and review happen? People seem to use
> either mail, or centralized messaging (and the latter often
> involves non-Free systems like GitHub or Slack).
It would depend on the setup for the particular repo. Information abou
Paul Wise wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I had an idea that might be interesting to git folks:
>
> light-weight pull requests:
>
> Anonymous and ssh/http-identified users should be able to push just
> using git, within the refs/pull/ namespace, to any non-existent branch
> name or to a branch they create
On Mon, 2017-02-06 at 19:57 -0500, Santiago Torres wrote:
> IMHO, the notion of a PR/MR is more specific to Git repository
> management tools (e.g., GitHub, GitLab). They all have specific
> concepts/ways to manage the way how their hosted repositories behave ---
> and I believe this flexibility i
Hello, pabs.
IMHO, the notion of a PR/MR is more specific to Git repository
management tools (e.g., GitHub, GitLab). They all have specific
concepts/ways to manage the way how their hosted repositories behave ---
and I believe this flexibility is one of the beauties in Git . I could
see how this c
Hi all,
I had an idea that might be interesting to git folks:
light-weight pull requests:
Anonymous and ssh/http-identified users should be able to push just
using git, within the refs/pull/ namespace, to any non-existent branch
name or to a branch they created when previously identified, withou
5 matches
Mail list logo
