On Tue, 10 Sep 2013, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Nicolas Pitre n...@fluxnic.net wrote:
An eventual optimization to index-pack when completing a pack would be
to attempt the encoding of appended tree objects into the packv4
Nicolas Pitre n...@fluxnic.net writes:
very much appreciated to On Tue, 10 Sep 2013, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Nicolas Pitre n...@fluxnic.net wrote:
An eventual optimization to index-pack when completing a pack would be
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Nicolas Pitre n...@fluxnic.net writes:
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013, Junio C Hamano wrote:
There may be trees in the wild that record 100775 or 100777 in the
mode field for executable blobs, which also need to be special
cased.
All the file mode
While reviewing the pack v4 thin support Ive realized that some base
tree objects appended to a thin pack won't be in pack v4 format. Hence
the patch below to deal with that possibility.
An eventual optimization to index-pack when completing a pack would be
to attempt the encoding of appended
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Nicolas Pitre n...@fluxnic.net wrote:
An eventual optimization to index-pack when completing a pack would be
to attempt the encoding of appended tree objects into the packv4 format
using the existing dictionary table in the pack, and fall back to the
canonical
5 matches
Mail list logo