Hi Matthew,
On Fri, 5 Jan 2018, Matthew Orres wrote:
> Beautiful!
>
> Pulled down that commit, was able to build and can confirm the issue
> is fixed in git gui!
>
> This has been a thorn in my side, so I appreciate your help! I look
> forward to it being included in the next release for git
> This happens *only* if the other developers also have somefile mentioned
> in their .gitignore.
It will be mentioned, because of I can add/push, wait developers pull, add/push
I can do this because I was angry or was fired. So this is my last "surprise"
for others ))
>> EXPECTED: git
Hi,
On Sat, 6 Jan 2018, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2018, Matthew Orres wrote:
>
> > Beautiful!
> >
> > Pulled down that commit, was able to build and can confirm the issue
> > is fixed in git gui!
> >
> > This has been a thorn in my side, so I appreciate your help! I look
> >
Hi team,
On Fri, 5 Jan 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> A release candidate Git v2.16.0-rc1 is now available for testing
> at the usual places. It is comprised of 455 non-merge commits
> since v2.15.0, contributed by 79 people, 23 of which are new faces.
I rebased Git for Windows' thicket of
Hi.
I run this command:
git log --graph --decorate --pretty=oneline --abbrev-commit --color-moved -C -L
534,545:lib/DB/Hooks.pm
at some point of evalutation I see:
http://joxi.net/Y2L4GQ0in480l2
* e348241 Wrap whole DB::DB into by moving DB::db into DB::interact
|
| diff --git
My name is Laura J.Richardson,From Caribou,Maine United States of America. A
Lieutenant Major-General. Please can we be friends?
Hi Junio,
On Fri, 5 Jan 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
>
> > Skip the newly added file creation tests on Windows proper, these
> > already work under Cygwin, but as that involves a significant
> > emulation layer the results are different under
On Sat, Jan 06 2018, Johannes Schindelin jotted:
> Hi Junio,
>
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
>>
>> > Skip the newly added file creation tests on Windows proper, these
>> > already work under Cygwin, but as that involves a
Hi Yasushi,
On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 3:27 PM, Yasushi SHOJI wrote:
> best_bisection_sorted() seems to do
>
> - get the commit list along with the number of elements in the list
> - walk the list one by one to check whether a element have TREESAME or not
> - if
On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 12:14:28PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Martin Fick writes:
>
> > These scenarios seem to come up most for me at Gerrit hack-
> > a-thons where we collaborate a lot in short time spans on
> > changes. We (the Gerrit maintainers) too have wanted
Hi Martin,
Thank you for your comment.
I haven't have time to read the code carefully so bare with me.
On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 5:21 PM, Martin Ågren wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Yasushi SHOJI
>> wrote:
>>> When does the list
On 6 January 2018 at 15:27, Yasushi SHOJI wrote:
> best_bisection_sorted() seems to do
>
> - get the commit list along with the number of elements in the list
> - walk the list one by one to check whether a element have TREESAME or not
> - if TREESAME, skip
> - if
On Sat, Jan 06, 2018 at 10:29:19AM -0700, Carl Baldwin wrote:
> To me, this is roughly equivalent to saying that parent pointers
> embedded in a commit object is a good idea because we want a richer
> relationship than mere "parent". Look how much we've done with this
> simple relationship.
On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 5:10 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Eric Sunshine
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
>>> +static inline void colors_unset(const char **use_color,
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Yasushi SHOJI
> wrote:
>> When does the list allowed to contain NULLs?
Short answer: there are no commits left to test.
The list is built in the for-loop in `find_bisection()`. So the
technical answer is: if all commits in the initial
Dear GOD Elect,
It's my pleasure to have contact with you, based on the critical
condition I find mine self, though, it's not financial problem, but my
health, you might have know that cancer is not what to talk home
about, though I don't know you, and my contact with you was not by
mistake, but
Signed-off-by: Kaartic Sivaraam
---
Documentation/git-submodule.txt | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/git-submodule.txt b/Documentation/git-submodule.txt
index befbccde6..5c4d941cc 100644
---
Signed-off-by: Kaartic Sivaraam
---
Documentation/gitsubmodules.txt | 19 ++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/gitsubmodules.txt b/Documentation/gitsubmodules.txt
index 745a3838e..339fb73db 100644
---
Signed-off-by: Kaartic Sivaraam
---
Documentation/gitsubmodules.txt | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/gitsubmodules.txt b/Documentation/gitsubmodules.txt
index 3f73983d5..e3c798d2a 100644
---
Signed-off-by: Kaartic Sivaraam
---
Documentation/gitsubmodules.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/gitsubmodules.txt b/Documentation/gitsubmodules.txt
index e3c798d2a..745a3838e 100644
---
Signed-off-by: Kaartic Sivaraam
---
Documentation/gitsubmodules.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/gitsubmodules.txt b/Documentation/gitsubmodules.txt
index bf46b0fb5..cb795c6b6 100644
---
Signed-off-by: Kaartic Sivaraam
---
Documentation/gitsubmodules.txt | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/gitsubmodules.txt b/Documentation/gitsubmodules.txt
index 46cf120f6..bf46b0fb5 100644
---
Signed-off-by: Kaartic Sivaraam
---
Documentation/git-submodule.txt | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/git-submodule.txt b/Documentation/git-submodule.txt
index ff612001d..befbccde6 100644
---
These are just a few improvements that I thought would make the documentation
related to submodules a little better in various way such as readability,
consistency etc., These were things I noticed while reading thise documents.
Sorry, for the highly granular patches. I did the commits as and
Signed-off-by: Kaartic Sivaraam
---
Documentation/gitsubmodules.txt | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/gitsubmodules.txt b/Documentation/gitsubmodules.txt
index cb795c6b6..3f73983d5 100644
--- a/Documentation/gitsubmodules.txt
+++
Hi Ævar,
On Sat, 6 Jan 2018, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> As I explained in 20180105221222.28867-1-ava...@gmail.com the actual
> benefit of this test is that as much as possible is tested
> *somewhere*.
And what I am trying to get across is that your tests are excessive. I do
not see the
On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 7:51 PM, Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
> Nobody likes to run tests that take too
> long. And look at this:
>
> ...
> ok 1511 - ipathmatch: match 'Z' '[Z-y]'
> ok 1512 - ipathmatch(ls): match '[Z-y]' 'Z'
> # still have
Dear Talented,
I am Talent Scout For BLUE SKY FILM STUDIO, Present Blue sky Studio a
Film Corporation Located in the United State, is Soliciting for the
Right to use Your Photo/Face and Personality as One of the Semi -Major
Role/ Character in our Upcoming ANIMATED Stereoscope 3D Movie-The Story
The man page for update-index says
-q
Quiet. If --refresh finds that the index needs an update,
the default behavior is to error out. This
option makes git update-index continue anyway.
--ignore-submodules
Do not try to update submodules. This
Hi,
Git 2.16.0-rc1 introduced 8 update messages, and let's
start the 2nd round of l10n for Git 2.16.0.
The new "git.pot" is generated from Git 2.16.0-rc1:
l10n: git.pot: v2.16.0 round 2 (8 new, 4 removed)
Generate po/git.pot from v2.16.0-rc1 for git v2.16.0 l10n round 2.
On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Kaartic Sivaraam
wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Kaartic Sivaraam
> ---
> diff --git a/Documentation/gitsubmodules.txt b/Documentation/gitsubmodules.txt
> @@ -36,8 +36,8 @@ The `gitlink` entry contains the object
On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Kaartic Sivaraam
wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Kaartic Sivaraam
> ---
> diff --git a/Documentation/gitsubmodules.txt b/Documentation/gitsubmodules.txt
> @@ -63,6 +63,9 @@ Submodules can be used for at least two
On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Kaartic Sivaraam
wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Kaartic Sivaraam
> ---
> diff --git a/Documentation/gitsubmodules.txt b/Documentation/gitsubmodules.txt
> @@ -76,9 +76,9 @@ The configuration of submodules
> - * The
On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Kaartic Sivaraam
wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Kaartic Sivaraam
> ---
> diff --git a/Documentation/gitsubmodules.txt b/Documentation/gitsubmodules.txt
> @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ obtain the submodule from is configured
On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Kaartic Sivaraam
wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Kaartic Sivaraam
> ---
> diff --git a/Documentation/gitsubmodules.txt b/Documentation/gitsubmodules.txt
> @@ -76,9 +76,10 @@ The configuration of submodules
> - * The
On Sat, Jan 06, 2018 at 10:29:21AM -0700, Carl Baldwin wrote:
> > When n==m==1, "amended" pointer from X1 to A1 may allow you to
> > answer "Is this the first attempt? If this is refined, what did the
> > earlier one look like?" when given X1, but you would also want to
> > answer a related
Hi again,
On Sat, 6 Jan 2018, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> > A release candidate Git v2.16.0-rc1 is now available for testing
> > at the usual places. It is comprised of 455 non-merge commits
> > since v2.15.0, contributed by 79 people, 23 of which
Hi,
I analyzed the GitHub repository with Cppcheck. The resulting XML file
is attached. Please open it in Cppcheck to view it comfortably.
Especially the bunch of errors could be of interest to you.
Greetings
Friedrich
Permission To Transfer $18 Million Usd
If with your permission, understanding and joint effort I can arrange
for the transfer of $18 Million Usd into your personal or corporate
account. This transaction is legitimate and legal and hence you have no
need to worry.
On acceptance of this offer
Hi all,
I've noticed an issue regarding the use of `git subtree add` and `git
subtree pull` when the subtree repository's commit (either HEAD or
whatever commit specified by the subtree command) is signed with GPG.
It seems to work properly if the commit is not signed but previous
commits are.
40 matches
Mail list logo