The shell word splitting done in base is a bashism, iow not portable.
Best
2012/10/30, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com:
No reason to use the full path in case this is used externally.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
---
t/test-lib.sh | 3 ++-
1 file
Hi Konstantin,
thanks for the reply.
The versions of git are:
- on remote: 1.5.6.5
- on windows build machine: 1.7.11.msysgit.1
- on mac build machine: 1.7.3.4
I will try to install latest git version on my remote server and get
back to you.
thanks again
Kevin
On 10/29/12 6:18 PM,
Elia Pinto wrote:
The shell word splitting done in base is a bashism, iow not portable.
No, ${varname##glob} is in POSIX and we already use it here and there.
See Documentation/CodingGuidelines:
- We use ${parameter#word} and its [#%] siblings, and their
doubled longest matching form.
Any follow-up on this?
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Scott Chacon scha...@gmail.com wrote:
So, this is due to the major AWS outage today. git-scm.com is hosted
on Heroku and thus on AWS. Heroku is continuing to bring up their
database systems in the wake of the massive AWS outage. Once
Not seen any recently. I'm guessing the dev is in the path of
hurricane Sandy? (Not sarcasm, btw.)
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Kevin i...@ikke.info wrote:
Any follow-up on this?
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Scott Chacon scha...@gmail.com wrote:
So, this is due to the major AWS
From: Jeff King [mailto:p...@peff.net]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 8:07 AM
To: Joachim Schmitz
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fix 'make test' for HP NonStop
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:57:10PM +0200, Joachim Schmitz wrote:
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Orgad and Raizel Shaneh
org...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy pclo...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Orgad and Raizel Shaneh
org...@gmail.com wrote:
Could be path normalization. What does git
patch.diff
Description: Binary data
'update-index --refresh' and 'diff-index' (without --cached) don't honor
the core.preloadindex setting yet. Porcelain commands using these (such as
git [svn] rebase) suffer from this, especially on Windows.
Use read_cache_preload to improve performance.
Additionally, in builtin/diff.c, don't
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:50 AM, karsten.bl...@dcon.de wrote:
'update-index --refresh' and 'diff-index' (without --cached) don't honor
the core.preloadindex setting yet. Porcelain commands using these (such as
git [svn] rebase) suffer from this, especially on Windows.
Use read_cache_preload
Hi. I routinely work with projects in both hg and git, so I'm really
interested in this. Thanks for working on it! I grabbed the latest version
from
https://github.com/felipec/git/blob/fc-remote-hg/contrib/remote-hg/git-remote-hg
and have been trying it out. For the most part, it seems to
Chris Webb ch...@arachsys.com writes:
The first is really a symptom of a general difference between hg and git: an
hg
repository can have multiple heads, whereas a git repo has exactly one head.
By this I mean an hg repository without bookmarks or branches can still have
multiple heads,
Hi,
(I am a French student, sorry for my English.)
So, i want import my perforce projet on my server git.
perforce my project tree :
depot
dev_data
mainline
release_1.0
release_1.0.0
my command is :
git-p4 clone -v --detect-branches //depot@all /home/user/projets/deport
The problem
Am 30.10.2012 09:07, schrieb Mike Norman:
Not seen any recently. I'm guessing the dev is in the path of
hurricane Sandy? (Not sarcasm, btw.)
Do you still see failures? I checked out the website just now and it
seemed to work flawlessly (at least the links I tried, could not find
any Sharing
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:53:08 +0100, Francis Moreau francis.m...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I'm using git-commit with the --template option. The template I'm
given is self sufficient for my purpose but as stated in the
documentation, git-commit wants the template to be edited otherwise it
aborts
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:21:40AM +0100, Joachim Schmitz wrote:
This fixes the vast majority of test failures on HP NonStop.
Some test don't work with /bin/diff, some fail with /bin/tar,
so let's put /usr/local/bin in PATH first.
Some tests fail with /bin/sh (link to /bin/ksh) so use bash
Am 10/30/2012 11:53, schrieb Francis Moreau:
I'm using git-commit with the --template option. The template I'm
given is self sufficient for my purpose but as stated in the
documentation, git-commit wants the template to be edited otherwise it
aborts the operation.
Is it possible to change
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 06:47:05PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 06:35:21PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
The patch below fixes it, but it's terribly inefficient (it just detects
the situation and reallocates). It would be much better to disable the
reuse_worktree_file mmap
(1) sounds attractive for more than one reason. In addition to avoidance of
this issue, it would bring bug-to-bug compatibility across platforms.
(4), if we can run grep on streaming data (tweak interface we have for checking
out a large blob to the working tree), would let us work on dataset
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 09:46:01PM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
(1) sounds attractive for more than one reason. In addition to
avoidance of this issue, it would bring bug-to-bug compatibility
across platforms.
Yeah. I mentioned breaking the build for people who would now need to
turn on
Sorry for reacting so late, I didn't read the list carefully in the last weeks
and my gmail filter somehow didn't trigger on that.
On Tuesday 02 October 2012 16:20:22 Junio C Hamano wrote:
* fa/remote-svn (2012-09-19) 16 commits
- Add a test script for remote-svn
- remote-svn: add
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Tomas Carnecky
tomas.carne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:53:08 +0100, Francis Moreau francis.m...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I'm using git-commit with the --template option. The template I'm
given is self sufficient for my purpose but as stated
I tried to install git 1.8 on the remote server and get exactly the same
problem :(.
Kevin
On 10/29/12 6:18 PM, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 09:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
Kevin Molcard kev2...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a problem with my build system.
I have a remote server with a
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Chris Webb ch...@arachsys.com wrote:
Hi. I routinely work with projects in both hg and git, so I'm really
interested in this. Thanks for working on it! I grabbed the latest version
from
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 3:45 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's a bit of reorganition. I'm introducing a new __gitcompadd helper that
is
useful to wrapp all changes to COMPREPLY, but first, lets get rid of
unnecessary assignments as SZEDER suggested.
The zsh
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 06:23:30PM +0100, Kacper Kornet wrote:
That patch just blocks non-forced updates to refs/tags/. I think a saner
start would be to disallow updating non-commit objects without a force.
We already do so
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:02:31PM +0100, Felipe Contreras wrote:
If remote-hg is going to live in contrib, it probably makes sense to
have its tests live there, too, like subtree.
Probably, I'll check that option.
But
Hi all,
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012, Jeff King wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:47:04PM +0100, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Yeah, the test script is not ready for merging, it needs to check
for python, hg, and hg-git.
Do you have hg-git installed?
No. But it's important that it fail
Hi Chris,
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012, Chris Webb wrote:
I routinely work with projects in both hg and git, so I'm really
interested in this. Thanks for working on it! I grabbed the latest
version from
https://github.com/felipec/git/blob/fc-remote-hg/contrib/remote-hg/git-remote-hg
and have
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
Yes, it seems this is an API issue; repo.branchtip doesn't exist in
python 2.2.
Hi. Presumably this is a problem with old mercurial not a problem with old
python as mentioned in the commit?
Both issues should be fixed now :)
They are
The --jobs parameter may be used to set the degree of per-submodule
parallel execution.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Zager sza...@google.com
---
Documentation/git-submodule.txt |8 ++-
git-submodule.sh| 40 ++-
2 files changed, 46
The --jobs parameter may be used to set the degree of per-submodule
parallel execution.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Zager sza...@google.com
---
Documentation/git-submodule.txt |8 ++-
git-submodule.sh| 40 ++-
2 files changed, 46
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Johannes Schindelin
johannes.schinde...@gmx.de wrote:
P.S.: I would still recommend to have a detailed look at the 'devel'
branch, in particular the commits starting with fast-export: do not refer
to non-existing marks and ending with t5801: skip without hg. My
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
When an object has already been exported (and thus is in the marks) it
is flagged as SHOWN, so it will not be exported again, even if this time
it's exported through a different ref.
We don't need the object
Chris Webb ch...@arachsys.com writes:
A common idiom when working with hg bookmarks is to completely ignore the
(not very useful) hg branches (i.e. all commits are on the default hg
branch) and have a bookmark for each line of development used exactly as a
git branch would be.
On such a
Michael Haggerty wrote:
Move the responsibility for normalizing prefixes from
longest_ancestor_length() to its callers. Use slightly different
normalizations at the two callers:
In setup_git_directory_gently_1(), use the old normalization, which
ignores paths that are not usable. In the
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Chris Webb ch...@arachsys.com wrote:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
Yes, it seems this is an API issue; repo.branchtip doesn't exist in
python 2.2.
Hi. Presumably this is a problem with old mercurial not a problem with old
python as
Michael Haggerty mhagger at alum.mit.edu writes:
...
-static int parse_dirstat_params(struct diff_options *options, const char ...
+static int parse_dirstat_params(struct diff_options *options, const char ...
struct strbuf *errmsg)
{
- const char *p =
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Sverre Rabbelier srabbel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
When an object has already been exported (and thus is in the marks) it
is flagged as SHOWN, so it will not be exported again, even
Felipe Contreras wrote:
Setting commit to commit is a no-op.
Wrong description. This should say:
The code uses the idiom of assigning commit to itself to quench a
may be used uninitialized warning. Luckily at least modern
versions of gcc do not produce that warning
(actually cc-ing the git list this time. Sorry for the noise, all.)
Felipe Contreras wrote:
[Subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] fast-export: fix comparisson in tests]
First the expected, then the actual, otherwise the diff would be the
opposite of what we want.
Spelling: s/comparisson/comparison/.
Felipe Contreras wrote:
They have been marked as UNINTERESTING for a reason, lets respect that.
This patch looks unsafe, and in the examples listed in the patch
description the changed behavior does not look like an improvement.
Worse, the description lists a few examples but gives no
Hi,
Note: sorry for the noise, the first try (v2) was silently eaten by the mailing
list handler.
First patches are general cleanups and fixes, the last patch fixes a real issue
that affects remote helpers.
Changes since v2:
* Actually send it to the ml
Changes since v1:
* Improved commit
Setting commit to commit is a no-op. It might have been there to avoid a
compiler warning, but if so, it was the compiler to blame.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
---
builtin/fast-export.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
First the expected, then the actual, otherwise the diff would be the
opposite of what we want.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
---
t/t9350-fast-export.sh | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/t9350-fast-export.sh
When an object has already been exported (and thus is in the marks) it
is flagged as SHOWN, so it will not be exported again, even if this time
it's exported through a different ref.
We don't need the object to be exported again, but we want the ref
updated, which doesn't happen.
Since we can't
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Angelo Borsotti
angelo.borso...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Cris,
I think a key in the config file of the remote repo is better than an
option on git-push for what concerns security: it allows the owner of
the remote repo to enforce the policy not to overwrite tags,
(again to the mailing list)
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
Felipe Contreras wrote:
They have been marked as UNINTERESTING for a reason, lets respect that.
That doesn't say anything.
and in the examples listed in the patch
description the changed
Hi Felipe,
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
But you mentioned something about cooperation, and I've yet to see how
is it that you are planning to cooperate. If you say you don't have time
to spend on this, I don't see why I should worry about testing this
series of patches.
It
Hi Felipe,
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com
wrote:
and in the examples listed in the patch
description
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Johannes Schindelin
johannes.schinde...@gmx.de wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
But you mentioned something about cooperation, and I've yet to see how
is it that you are planning to cooperate. If you say you don't have time
to spend on
Am 28.10.2012 01:02, schrieb Jens Lehmann:
Am 26.10.2012 22:43, schrieb Francis Moreau:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Jens Lehmann jens.lehm...@web.de wrote:
[...]
That is weird, git diff --submodule should show that too. Is there
anything unusual about your setup? (The only explanation
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Why would it? We are not changing the way objects are exported, the
only difference is what happens at the end
(handle_tags_and_duplicates()).
Because the marking is per-commit, not per-ref, right? Perhaps you
shawn wilson ag4ve...@gmail.com writes:
i'm curious why this is being reported as deleted in status and diff
and not modified? this was tested on a build of the master branch of
the current git repo (1.8.0).
mkdir t cd t; git --init
touch test
git add test
git commit test -m test
ln -s
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
shawn wilson ag4ve...@gmail.com writes:
% git status
# On branch master
# Changes not staged for commit:
# (use git add/rm file... to update what will be committed)
# (use git checkout -- file... to discard
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 03:39:01AM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
By using print_comp as suggested by SZEDER Gábor.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
---
t/t9902-completion.sh | 13 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git
Am 29.10.2012 08:11, schrieb Johannes Sixt:
Am 10/29/2012 0:28, schrieb Jens Lehmann:
+/* Remove trailing '/' from directories to find submodules in the index
*/
+for (i = 0; i argc; i++) {
+size_t pathlen = strlen(argv[i]);
+if (pathlen
shawn wilson ag4ve...@gmail.com writes:
but should t2 be reported as 'deleted'?
Sure, that's what you did.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
And now for something completely different.
--
To unsubscribe
Felipe Contreras wrote:
% git fast-export $marks_args one
% git fast-export $marks_args one two
Then yeah, 'one' will be updated once again in the second command,
That's probably worth a mention in the commit message and tests
(test_expect_failure), to save future readers from some
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
and in the examples listed in the patch
description the changed behavior does not look like an improvement.
I
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:27 PM, SZEDER Gábor sze...@ira.uka.de wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 03:39:01AM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
By using print_comp as suggested by SZEDER Gábor.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
---
t/t9902-completion.sh | 13 +
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
shawn wilson ag4ve...@gmail.com writes:
but should t2 be reported as 'deleted'?
Sure, that's what you did.
if i do the same to a file (same repo):
touch test2
git add test2
git commit test2 -m test2
rm test
ln -s
Felipe Contreras wrote:
So you think what we have now is the correct behavior:
% git fast-export master ^master
reset refs/heads/master
from :0
No, I don't think that, either.
Hope that helps,
Jonathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message
shawn wilson ag4ve...@gmail.com writes:
why is this different?
You didn't tell git about t2/one/test. You need to add it first to make
it known.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
And now for something
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Sverre Rabbelier srabbel...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Why would it? We are not changing the way
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
Felipe Contreras wrote:
So you think what we have now is the correct behavior:
% git fast-export master ^master
reset refs/heads/master
from :0
No, I don't think that, either.
Well, that's what we have now, and
Felipe Contreras wrote:
Well, that's what we have now, and you want to preserve this feature
(aka bug), right?
Nope. I just don't want regressions, and found a patch description
that did nothing to explain to the reader how it avoids regressions
more than a little disturbing.
I also think
Thanks. I know that posix support these usages, but exists some
traditional shell that not support it. These are described in the
autoconf manual, last time i have checked. As the construct ; export
var = x should be portable, but it is not. If this is important these
days i don't know.
Best
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Sverre Rabbelier srabbel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Sverre Rabbelier srabbel...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Felipe Contreras
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
shawn wilson ag4ve...@gmail.com writes:
and once it's added, status says:
# renamed:t2 - t2/one/test
that's not exactly true, but...
What's wrong with it? Both files have the same contents, which is
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
Felipe Contreras wrote:
Well, that's what we have now, and you want to preserve this feature
(aka bug), right?
Nope. I just don't want regressions, and found a patch description
that did nothing to explain to the
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Which is expected and correct; the branch already points to the right
commit, no need for an extra reset.
I think you're correct. Thanks for confirming.
--
Cheers,
Sverre Rabbelier
--
To unsubscribe from this
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 03:39:00AM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Lots of duplicated code!
No functional changes.
I'm not sure.
I'm all for removing duplicated application code, but I'm usually more
conservative when it comes to test code. The more logic, the more
possibility for bugs in
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Sverre Rabbelier srabbel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Which is expected and correct; the branch already points to the right
commit, no need for an extra reset.
I think you're correct.
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 03:45:41AM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
The idea is to never touch the COMPREPLY variable directly.
This allows other completion systems override __gitcompadd, and do
something different instead.
Also, this allows the simplification of the completion tests
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:45 PM, SZEDER Gábor sze...@ira.uka.de wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 03:39:00AM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Lots of duplicated code!
No functional changes.
I'm not sure.
I'm all for removing duplicated application code, but I'm usually more
conservative when
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:58 PM, SZEDER Gábor sze...@ira.uka.de wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 03:45:41AM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
The idea is to never touch the COMPREPLY variable directly.
This allows other completion systems override __gitcompadd, and do
something different instead.
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 02:41:21AM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:28 PM, SZEDER Gábor sze...@ira.uka.de wrote:
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 05:52:49PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
diff --git a/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash
I just checked and the issue seems to be fixed! Clicked around on a
bunch of previously broken links and they work!
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 3:38 AM, Holger Hellmuth (IKS)
hellm...@ira.uka.de wrote:
Am 30.10.2012 09:07, schrieb Mike Norman:
Not seen any recently. I'm guessing the dev is in the
Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
Nope. I just don't want regressions, and found a patch description
that did nothing to explain to the reader how it avoids regressions
more than a little disturbing.
I see, so you don't have
Felipe Contreras wrote:
--- a/builtin/fast-export.c
+++ b/builtin/fast-export.c
@@ -523,11 +523,16 @@ static void get_tags_and_duplicates(struct object_array
*pending,
typename(e-item-type));
continue;
}
- if
Hi again,
Felipe Contreras wrote:
They have been marked as UNINTERESTING for a reason, lets respect that.
So, the above description conveyed zero information, as you mentioned.
A clearer explanation would be the following:
fast-export: don't emit reset command for negative refs
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
Nope. I just don't want regressions, and found a patch description
that did nothing to explain to the reader how it
Felipe Contreras wrote:
I don't think it's my job to explain to you how 'git fast-export'
works.
Actually, if you are submitting a patch for inclusion, it is your job
to explain to future readers what the patch does. Yes, the reader
might not be deeply familiar with the part of fast-export
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 1:57 AM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
Felipe Contreras wrote:
They have been marked as UNINTERESTING for a reason, lets respect that.
So, the above description conveyed zero information, as you mentioned.
I meant, this, of course:
They have been
Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 5:46 AM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
Felipe Contreras wrote:
No reason to use the full path in case this is used externally.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
No reason not to is not a reason to do
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
Felipe Contreras wrote:
--- a/builtin/fast-export.c
+++ b/builtin/fast-export.c
@@ -523,11 +523,16 @@ static void get_tags_and_duplicates(struct
object_array *pending,
Felipe Contreras wrote:
It's not my job to
explain to you that 'git fast-export' doesn't work this way, you have
a command line to type those commands and see for yourself if they do
what you think they do with a vanilla version of git.
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 2:27 AM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 5:46 AM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
Felipe Contreras wrote:
No reason to use the full path in case this is used externally.
Signed-off-by: Felipe
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 1:11 AM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
(cc-ing the git list)
Felipe Contreras wrote:
When an object has already been exported (and thus is in the marks) it
is flagged as SHOWN, so it will not be exported again, even if this time
it's exported through a
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
Felipe Contreras wrote:
--- a/builtin/fast-export.c
+++ b/builtin/fast-export.c
@@ -523,11 +523,16 @@ static void get_tags_and_duplicates(struct
object_array *pending,
Felipe Contreras wrote:
It's all fun and games to write explanations for things, but it's not
that easy when you want those explanations to be actually true, and
corrent--you have to spend time to make sure of that.
That's why it's useful for the patch submitter to write them, asking
for help
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:13 AM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
Felipe Contreras wrote:
It's all fun and games to write explanations for things, but it's not
that easy when you want those explanations to be actually true, and
corrent--you have to spend time to make sure of that.
The Abercrombie brand dedication of this kind of a higher level of good
results. abercrombie and fitch http://www.abercrombiefitchonlineschweiz.eu
clothing webpage previously has everything, your option. You can be in the
position to see the garments of your respective own alternative. The
References are allowed to update from one commit-ish to another if the
former is a ancestor of the latter. This behavior is oriented to
branches which are expected to move with commits. Tag references are
expected to be static in a repository, though, thus an update to a
tag (lightweight and
Hi,
(again because the mailing list rejected it) (Gmal switched interface
and HTML is the default)
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Chris Rorvick ch...@rorvick.com wrote:
References are allowed to update from one commit-ish to another if the
former is a ancestor of the latter. This behavior
96 matches
Mail list logo
