On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 09:12:44AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> David Aguilar writes:
>
> > @@ -514,8 +514,11 @@ static int get_sha1_basic(const char *str, int len,
> > unsigned char *sha1,
> >
> > if (warn_ambiguous_refs &&
> > (refs_found > 1 ||
> > -!get_short_sha1(str
When a reflog is deleted, e.g. when "git stash" clears its stashes,
"git rev-parse --verify --quiet" dies:
fatal: Log for refs/stash is empty.
The reason is that the get_sha1() code path does not allow us
to suppress this message.
Pass the flags bitfield through get_sha1_with_context() s
I am a private lender,i can help you with a loan you looking for @ 3%
interest rate, Interested call,email or text (315) 784-1794.
Kenneth woodard
Email: woodar...@gmail.com
telephone:+1 (315) 784-1794.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a me
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy writes:
> Another patch to test the water before I put more effort into it.
>
> Commit d516c2d (Teach git-diff-files the new option `--no-index` -
> 2007-02-22) brings the bells and whistles of git-diff to the world
> outside a git repository. This patch continues that direc
Add a new format specifier, '%D' that is identical in behaviour to '%d',
except that it does not include the ' (' prefix or ')' suffix provided
by '%d'.
Signed-off-by: Harry Jeffery
---
Documentation/pretty-formats.txt | 6 --
log-tree.c | 17 +
log-tre
Helpdesk is about to disable your current webmail to create the new Outlook
Office 365 . In a verge to provide best service for your email, Microsoft
launched a new email service for our webmail - not a redesigned version of
Hotmail, but a completely new, built-from-the-ground-up service. This
Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with
'-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with
'+' are in 'next'.
You can find the changes described here in the integration branches
of the repositories listed at
http://git-blame.blogspot.com/p/git-publi
Today I learned that software can be constipated.
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Thanks!
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majord
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Does the order of changes that appear in
>
> https://code-review.googlesource.com/#/q/project:git+branch:master+topic:ref-transaction
>
> have any significance? e.g. is a "topic" supposed to be a single
> strand of pearls on top of the "branch", and the top one is the tip,
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Stefan Beller writes:
>
>> We actually want to have the size of one 'name' and not the size
>> of the names array.
> ...
> I suspect that the latter is "size of a pointer that points at a
> cmdname structure", but the original code in help_unknown_cmd() is
> wrong. The
Jonathan Nieder writes:
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Jonathan: Is a current version of this patch series set up to be
>> fetched so that it can be reviewed outside Gerrit?
>
> The current tip is 06d707cb63e34fc55a18ecc47e668f3c44acae57 from
> https://code.googlesource.com/git (fetch-by-sha1 shoul
Stefan Beller writes:
> We actually want to have the size of one 'name' and not the size
> of the names array.
I suspect that the latter is "size of a pointer that points at a
cmdname structure", but the original code in help_unknown_cmd() is
wrong. The ones in load_command_list() do this corre
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jonathan: Is a current version of this patch series set up to be
> fetched so that it can be reviewed outside Gerrit?
The current tip is 06d707cb63e34fc55a18ecc47e668f3c44acae57 from
https://code.googlesource.com/git (fetch-by-sha1 should work). Each
reroll gets its own r
Blocked and ignored signals -- but not caught signals -- are inherited
across exec. Some callers with sloppy signal-handling behavior can call
git with SIGPIPE blocked or ignored, even non-deterministically. When
SIGPIPE is blocked or ignored, several git commands can run indefinitely,
ignoring E
Michael Haggerty writes:
> On 09/13/2014 01:57 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Michael Haggerty wrote:
Jonathan Nieder writes:
>>
> so I'll send a reroll of the series as-is in an hour or so.
>>>
>>> Jonathan: Is a current version of this patch series set up for review in
>>> Gerrit?
>>
David Aguilar writes:
> @@ -514,8 +514,11 @@ static int get_sha1_basic(const char *str, int len,
> unsigned char *sha1,
>
> if (warn_ambiguous_refs &&
> (refs_found > 1 ||
> - !get_short_sha1(str, len, tmp_sha1, GET_SHA1_QUIETLY)))
> - warning(warn_msg, len
David Aguilar writes:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] rev-parse: honor --quiet when asking for reflog
> dates that do not exist
> ...
> Make rev-parse --verify --quiet ref@{1.year.ago} when the reflog
> does not go back that far succeed silently with --quiet.
> ...
> +test_expect_success 'succeeds si
Thanks; just to save time, you may want to look at what has already
been queued on 'pu'.
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:35 AM, Patrick Reynolds wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 3:11 AM, Jeff King wrote:
>> Would we want to call it from external C commands, too? For the most
>> part, git.c is the ent
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 3:11 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> Would we want to call it from external C commands, too? For the most
> part, git.c is the entry point for running git commands, and any
> sanitizing it does will be inherited by sub-commands. But it _is_ still
> legal to call dashed commands indi
On 2014-09-18 13.29, Christian Taube wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I was sent here from the IRC channel.
>
>
> Using git 2.1.0, the command
>
> git clone ssh://[2001:db8::1]/repo.git
>
> succeeds, but adding a username to the URL like this
>
> git clone ssh://user@[2001:db8::1]/repo.git
>
> fai
Hello,
I was sent here from the IRC channel.
Using git 2.1.0, the command
git clone ssh://[2001:db8::1]/repo.git
succeeds, but adding a username to the URL like this
git clone ssh://user@[2001:db8::1]/repo.git
fails with an invalid hostname message:
Cloning into 'repo.git'...
ssh: Coul
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 03:27:12PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Sixt writes:
>
> > I think this is a good move. Hooks are written by users, who sometimes
> > are not clueful enough.
>
> Thanks for a sanity check. I do not think it is about cluefulness
> in this particular case. A r
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 01:20:51PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> David Kastrup writes:
>
> > This gives the same result as
> >
> > git branch --verbose --merged
> >
> > namely _only_ listing the current branch verbosely.
>
> Hmph. Then that is a different issue. As I never use --merged
> mys
On 09/18/2014 06:32 AM, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
> On 09/16/2014 09:33 PM, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> []
>>
>> diff --git a/lockfile.c b/lockfile.c
>> index 983c3ec..00c972c 100644
>> --- a/lockfile.c
>> +++ b/lockfile.c
>> @@ -129,6 +129,22 @@ static int lock_file(struct lock_file *lk, const cha
(I am not on the list - please CC)
Thanks for git-svn - I use it instead of subversion itself for many years now.
Just thought I'd ask/report a few issues I noticed for some time
now, of tracking development of a particular subversion-based
development project. Broadly speaking, I think there are
26 matches
Mail list logo
