On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:52 AM, Rémi Rampin remiram...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-02-02 12:24 UTC-05:00, Remi Rampin remiram...@gmail.com:
proc _is_git {path} {
+ if {[file isfile $path]} {
+ set fp [open $path r]
+ gets $fp line
+ close $fp
+
The decimal_width function originally appeared in blame.c as
lineno_width, and was designed for calculating the
print-width of small-ish integer values (line numbers in
text files). In ec7ff5b, it was made into a reusable
function, and in dc801e7, we started using it to align
diffstats.
Binary
(Resending as plain text).
I could be wrong about this, but my correction above doesn't seem to
be in 'next'. Does that mean (reading your last what's cooking) that
the broken version is going to go out to 'master' soon?
Thanks,
Luke
On 5 February 2015 at 08:19, Luke Diamand l...@diamand.org
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth sschube...@gmail.com
---
check-builtins.sh | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/check-builtins.sh b/check-builtins.sh
index 07cff69..a0aaf3a 100755
--- a/check-builtins.sh
+++ b/check-builtins.sh
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
{
cat \EOF
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth sschube...@gmail.com
---
Makefile | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index c44eb3a..6f8ae23 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -2447,7 +2447,7 @@ check-docs::
esac; \
done ) | sort
-###
For consistency, we should use the same source for symbolic links as for
hard links and copies.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth sschube...@gmail.com
---
Makefile | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index c44eb3a..21f23cb 100644
---
We do this for BUILT_INS and REMOTE_CURL_ALIASES, so we should do so here,
too.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth sschube...@gmail.com
---
Makefile | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 21f23cb..d2849c3 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -2258,6
Hello.
I noticed some bizarre behaviour when using: git stash -u.
It deletes folders which contain files configured to be ignored. I
actually lost files by this which I could not restore.
Here is how you can reproduce the case.
1. Create a project folder to act as the root of the repository.
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 01:53:27AM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
I also notice that config_buf_ungetc does not actually ungetc the
character we give it; it just rewinds one character in the stream. This
is fine, because we always feed the last-retrieved character. I dunno if
it is worth fixing (it
Kyle J. McKay mack...@gmail.com writes:
Now, can you do that easily in a Makefile? ;)
Or is it worth doing it?
I do not mind a full symbolic link as long as it points at the
correct place (Sebastian's version did not under DESTDIR which was
the only issue I had against it), but is there a good
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
endif
$(RM)·$$execdir/$$p··\
test·-z·$(NO_INSTALL_HARDLINKS)$(NO_CROSS_DIRECTORY_HARDLINKS)··\
ln·$$bindir/$$p·$$execdir/$$p·2/dev/null·||·\
+ln·-s·../$$p·$$execdir/$$p·2/dev/null·||·\
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 01:53:27AM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
I also notice that config_buf_ungetc does not actually ungetc the
character we give it; it just rewinds one character in the stream. This
is fine, because we always feed the last-retrieved character. I
Matthieu Moy matthieu@grenoble-inp.fr writes:
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Perhaps something like this instead?
git-rebase - Rebuild a branch on top of a different commit
I would say Replay history on top of a different commit instead.
Rebuild may be misleading (it's
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Perhaps something like this instead?
git-rebase - Rebuild a branch on top of a different commit
I would say Replay history on top of a different commit instead.
Rebuild may be misleading (it's not build as in compile link),
and the rebased history
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 01:16:36PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 01:53:27AM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
I also notice that config_buf_ungetc does not actually ungetc the
character we give it; it just rewinds one character in the
Kyle J. McKay mack...@gmail.com writes:
On Feb 4, 2015, at 22:11, Scott Schmit wrote:
In my use of git, I've noticed that git status is a lot better at
tracking moves and renames than git diff, and this has recently
caused
me a lot of headaches because a large number of moves were made in a
Luke Diamand l...@diamand.org writes:
(Resending as plain text).
I could be wrong about this, but my correction above doesn't seem to
be in 'next'. Does that mean (reading your last what's cooking) that
the broken version is going to go out to 'master' soon?
The current copy of What's
Tobias Preuss tobias.pre...@googlemail.com writes:
I noticed some bizarre behaviour when using: git stash -u.
It deletes folders which contain files configured to be ignored.
The files you mark as ignored are expendable and this is not limited
to stash.
$ git init
Initialized empty
Sebastian Schuberth sschube...@gmail.com writes:
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth sschube...@gmail.com
---
Is that an improvement? Is the plural of dup (used as an
abbreviation of duplicate) dupes not dups?
Makefile | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 8:17 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Sebastian Schuberth sschube...@gmail.com writes:
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth sschube...@gmail.com
---
Is that an improvement? Is the plural of dup (used as an
abbreviation of duplicate) dupes not dups?
My view
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Sebastian Schuberth
sschube...@gmail.com wrote:
Is that an improvement? Is the plural of dup (used as an
abbreviation of duplicate) dupes not dups?
My view is that the abbreviation of duplicate is not dup but
dupe, hence the plural dupes.
For duplicate the
Kyle J. McKay mack...@gmail.com writes:
-ln -s git$X $$bindir/$$p 2/dev/null || \
+ln -s $$bindir/git$X $$bindir/$$p 2/dev/null || \
This is wrong.
Currently with symlinks you will get installed into bindir something
like this:
git
git-tag - git
git-show - git
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
This is wrong.
Currently with symlinks you will get installed into bindir something
like this:
git
git-tag - git
git-show - git
etc.
With your change you would have
git
git-tag -
Hi,
I'm experiencing a strange behavior of automatic git gc which corrupts a
local repository. Git version 2.2.2 on Mac OS X 10.10.1.
I'm using git p4 for synchronization with perforce. Sometimes after 'git
p4 rebase' git starts a garbage collection. When gc finishes a local
repository contains
Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with
'-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with
'+' are in 'next'.
Git 2.3 is out. I'll wait for some time for the dust to settle and
then rewind and rebuild 'next'.
You can find the changes described here in
Welcome to the Git development community.
This message is written by the maintainer and talks about how Git
project is managed, and how you can work with it.
* Mailing list and the community
The development is primarily done on the Git mailing list. Help
requests, feature proposals, bug reports
On Feb 5, 2015, at 12:59, Junio C Hamano wrote:
I do not know (and I am not quite sure if I want to know) how
serious your potential problems would be, and I do not doubt you
know OS X quirks much better than I do and do not intend to argue
there aren't such problems. I am just curious how
The latest feature release Git v2.3.0 is now available at the
usual places.
This one ended up to be a release with lots of small corrections and
improvements without big uncomfortably exciting features. It is a
lot smaller release than other recent feature releases, consisting
of 255 non-merge
New patch series. I hadn't realized Git doesn't recurse on gitdir: ...
links itself, it only follows one.
Also normalizes the path to the Git repository as requested.
Remi Rampin (2):
Fixes chooser not accepting gitfiles
Makes chooser set 'gitdir' to the resolved path
Makes _is_git handle the case where the path is a gitdir: ... file.
---
lib/choose_repository.tcl | 10 ++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/choose_repository.tcl b/lib/choose_repository.tcl
index 92d6022..abc6b1d 100644
--- a/lib/choose_repository.tcl
+++
If _is_git follows a gitdir: ... file link to get to the actual
repository, we want _gitdir to be set to that final path.
---
lib/choose_repository.tcl | 11 ---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/choose_repository.tcl b/lib/choose_repository.tcl
index
[adding git list to cc]
On 02/05/2015 04:49 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 03:27:23PM +0800, Zhu Guihua wrote:
This series is based on the previous patchset from Chen Fan:
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-05/msg02360.html
This email has an invalid
Kyle J. McKay:
I think something like this might do what you want:
git for-each-ref --format='%(refname)' refs/tags | \
while read t; do
if ! git merge-base --is-ancestor $t HEAD; then
echo ${t#refs/tags/}
fi
done
That works like a charm, thank you!
--
\\// Peter -
Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com writes:
Obviously my page as it is now is very different in tone from the
git-rebase page, but I think there are some aspects that could be
fruitfully merged. Would you be interested in patches of this sort,
or does the page seem too far from the
Matthieu Moy matthieu@grenoble-inp.fr writes:
NAME
git-rebase - Forward-port local commits to the updated upstream head
= Quite technical already.
Very much true, and I would say the description is technically
correct in the sense that it is not wrong per-se. There are a
few
On Feb 5, 2015, at 07:51, Sebastian Schuberth wrote:
For consistency, we should use the same source for symbolic links as
for
hard links and copies.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth sschube...@gmail.com
---
Makefile | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Feb 5, 2015, at 07:52, Sebastian Schuberth wrote:
We do this for BUILT_INS and REMOTE_CURL_ALIASES, so we should do so
here,
too.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth sschube...@gmail.com
---
Makefile | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com writes:
On 02/05/2015 04:49 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 03:27:23PM +0800, Zhu Guihua wrote:
This series is based on the previous patchset from Chen Fan:
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-05/msg02360.html
This email has
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 04:13:03PM +0100, Dmitry Neverov wrote:
I'm using git p4 for synchronization with perforce. Sometimes after 'git
p4 rebase' git starts a garbage collection. When gc finishes a local
repository contains no pack files only loose objects, so I have to
re-import repository
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Tobias Preuss tobias.pre...@googlemail.com writes:
I noticed some bizarre behaviour when using: git stash -u.
It deletes folders which contain files configured to be ignored.
The files you mark as ignored are expendable and this is not limited
to
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 08:26:08PM +0100, Sebastian Schuberth wrote:
It is not even correct, is it?
When DESTDIR is set to allow you to install into a temporary place
only so that you can tar up the resulting filesystem tree, bindir
points at the location we need to cp the built
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 11:29:07AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com writes:
On 02/05/2015 04:49 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 03:27:23PM +0800, Zhu Guihua wrote:
This series is based on the previous patchset from Chen Fan:
Sebastian Schuberth sschube...@gmail.com writes:
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth sschube...@gmail.com
---
check-builtins.sh | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/check-builtins.sh b/check-builtins.sh
index 07cff69..a0aaf3a 100755
--- a/check-builtins.sh
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Sebastian Schuberth
sschube...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Sebastian Schuberth
sschube...@gmail.com wrote:
Is that an improvement? Is the plural of dup (used as an
abbreviation of duplicate) dupes not dups?
My view is that the
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 11:29:07AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com writes:
On 02/05/2015 04:49 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 03:27:23PM +0800, Zhu Guihua wrote:
This series is based on the previous patchset
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 08:26:08PM +0100, Sebastian Schuberth wrote:
It is not even correct, is it?
When DESTDIR is set to allow you to install into a temporary place
only so that you can tar up the resulting filesystem
On Feb 5, 2015, at 11:51, Jeff King wrote:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 08:26:08PM +0100, Sebastian Schuberth wrote:
It is not even correct, is it?
When DESTDIR is set to allow you to install into a temporary place
only so that you can tar up the resulting filesystem tree, bindir
points at the
Thanks (and thanks for ungetc one, too).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 09:29:04PM +0100, Sebastian Schuberth wrote:
We would still want an equivalent to 2/2 to set up a relative symlink
for $(ALL_PROGRAMS), though, right?
Probably. But I'm not sure how to calculate the relative path
correctly so that it'll work with all possible bin /
49 matches
Mail list logo
