On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 09:21:58PM +0100, Christian Couder wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
>> > On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 01:45:27PM +0100, Christian Couder wrote:
>>
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:19 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 09:47:41PM +0100, Christian Couder wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 6:57 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> >
>> > Imagine we invent a new tree entry type, "gitref", that is
On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 09:21:58PM +0100, Christian Couder wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 01:45:27PM +0100, Christian Couder wrote:
> >> And with what Peff says above it looks like we will need ways
> >> configure
On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 01:45:27PM +0100, Christian Couder wrote:
>> And with what Peff says above it looks like we will need ways
>> configure and tweak commit reachability with gitlink/gitref anyway. So
>> the point
On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 01:45:27PM +0100, Christian Couder wrote:
> And with what Peff says above it looks like we will need ways
> configure and tweak commit reachability with gitlink/gitref anyway. So
> the point of gitref compared to gitlink would be that they just have a
> different
On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Christian Couder
wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 5:42 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Christian Couder writes:
>>
>>> Couldn't a RefTree be used to store refs that point to the base
>>>
On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 5:42 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Christian Couder writes:
>
>> Couldn't a RefTree be used to store refs that point to the base
>> commit,
>
> I think it is the other way around. With the new "gitref" thing
> that is a pointer
On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 03:45:09PM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Markus Hitter wrote:
> >
> > Hello all,
>
> +cc Paul Mackeras, who maintains gitk.
Thanks.
> >
> > after Gitk brought my shabby development machine (Core2Duo, 4 GB RAM,
> >
Dear Git users,
I finally got around to rebase the Windows-specific patches (which seem to
not make it upstream as fast as we get new ones) on top of upstream Git
v2.11.0-rc0, and to bundle installers, portable Git and MinGit [*1*]:
> * st/verify-tag (2016-10-10) 7 commits
> - t/t7004-tag: Add --format specifier tests
> - t/t7030-verify-tag: Add --format specifier tests
> - builtin/tag: add --format argument for tag -v
> - builtin/verify-tag: add --format to verify-tag
> - tag: add format specifier to gpg_verify_tag
> -
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 09:30:44AM -0400, Martin-Louis Bright wrote:
> I will see if I can find a OSX 10.6 system to test with, and I'll try with
> perl 5.10.
>
> --Martin
No need to worry too much:
I have tested Peffs patch applied on next OK-
And the integration into pu that came the 2nd
11 matches
Mail list logo