Hello,
So it would be great if the filter-branch beside the Rewrite
f8f0b351ae35ff7ac4bd58078cbba1aa34243779 (523/22625), would also
append a basic ETA signaling the end of the operation.
It could be as simple as the the average number of milliseconds per
step up to this point multiplied with
Hello,
Here's what I ended up using, and seemed to work well:
https://github.com/gaborbernat/git/commit/766841bc1b726a5d6e7e051938b82975368695a0
Does this looks okay, should I create a patch from this?
Thanks,
Bernát GÁBOR
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 4:15 AM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On
Amended, the latest version is at https://github.com/gaborbernat/git/commit/ :)
Bernát GÁBOR
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Gabor Bernat ber...@primeranks.net wrote:
Hello,
Here's what I ended up using, and seemed to work well:
https://github.com/gaborbernat/git/commit
wrote:
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Gabor Bernat ber...@primeranks.net wrote:
Amended, the latest version is at https://github.com/gaborbernat/git/commit/
:)
Does this looks okay, should I create a patch from this?
Excerpt:
now=$(date +%s)
elapsed=$(($now - $start
. Here follows a patch, I really hope I got
right the format:
From 620e69d10a1bfcfcace347cbb95991d75fd23a1d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gabor Bernat gabor.ber...@gravityrd.com
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 00:46:52 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add to the git filter-branch a --progress-eta flag which when
, 2015 at 5:15 AM, Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com
wrote:
(Please don't top-post on this list.)
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Gabor Bernat ber...@primeranks.net wrote:
Reading after it, I think the most close we can get with this is, awk
'BEGIN { print strftime(%c, 1271603087
I would argue against the every n commit check, or at least making it
configurable, as in my case the speed is something between 0.01 and
1.5 seconds per commit. Checking it every n commit would make it I
feel quite slow to adapt. But it's debatable.
On 8/30/15, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 10:15 PM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Gábor Bernát writes:
>>> +echo $(date +%s) | grep -q '^[0-9]+$'; 2>/dev/null && show_seconds=t
>>
>> That is very
I would lean for an extra on-demand flag for this, and a per commit
measurement, initial noise is okay for the first iteration I think.
Secondly note that on the output other messages could also be present
(other than the rewrite), as the command running may have its own
output. I will try to
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Gábor Bernát
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Eric Sunshine
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> > Eric Sunshine
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
> Gabor Bernat <ber...@primeranks.net> writes:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Gábor Bernát
>> ...
>>> Agreed, :) did not abandoned this, just got caught up with many stuff.
11 matches
Mail list logo