check-attr doesn't respect recursive definitions

2013-03-30 Thread Jan Larres
Hi, I am trying to write a custom archiving script that checks the export-ignore attribute to know which files from an ls-files output it should skip. Through this I noticed that for files in directories for which the export-ignore (or any other) attribute is set, check-attr still reports

Re: check-attr doesn't respect recursive definitions

2013-04-03 Thread Jan Larres
Thanks for the clarifications. Just a quick comment about the summary: Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote: Yeah, I had the same thought. So you would have to either: 1. Hook the feature into git-archive, which knows about how it recurses, and can report the correct set of paths. or 2.

Re: check-attr doesn't respect recursive definitions

2013-04-06 Thread Jan Larres
Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 8:45 PM, Jan Larres j...@majutsushi.net wrote: I would expect the last command to also report 'set'. I've also tried other patterns like 'foo/' and 'foo*', but it didn't make any difference. Try foo/**. You need 1.8.2 though