[PATCH] Implement ACL module architecture and sample MySQL ACL module

the sample MySQL module) and everything was working fine. Thanks, Michal Signed-off-by: Michal Novotny minov...@redhat.com --- Makefile | 1 + daemon.c | 123 + modules/acl/Makefile | 6 ++ modules/acl

Re: [PATCH] daemon: --access-hook option

=)) { timeout = atoi(arg+10); continue; -- Michal Novotny minov...@redhat.com, RHCE, Red Hat Virtualization | libvirt-php bindings | php-virt-control.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord

[PATCH] git-tag: Allow --points-at syntax to create a tag pointing to specified commit

) but it was not possible for signed and annotated commits. It's been tested for all of the tag types mentioned - lightweight tags, signed tags and also annotated tags and everything is working fine in all scenarios. Michal Signed-off-by: Michal Novotny minov...@redhat.com --- builtin/tag.c | 32

[PATCH v2] git-tag: Allow --points-at syntax to create a tag pointing to specified commit

been removed as it's not required and I accidentally forgot to remove it before posting v1 Michal Signed-off-by: Michal Novotny minov...@redhat.com --- builtin/tag.c | 32 ++-- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/builtin/tag.c b/builtin/tag.c

Re: [PATCH v2] git-tag: Allow --points-at syntax to create a tag pointing to specified commit

On 03/14/2013 02:36 PM, John Keeping wrote: On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 01:34:54PM +0100, Michal Novotny wrote: This patch adds the option to specify SHA-1 commit hash using --points-at option of git tag to create a tag pointing to a historical commit. What does this do that git tag name commit

with git 1.8.3.1 get only merged tags

Hello, I need to emulate git tag --merged with very old git 1.8.3.1. Is that somehow possible? I am looking for a bash function that would take what git 1.8.3.1 offers and return only the tags accessible from the current branch tip. Could you, please, give me at least a hint how this could be

allow "~" to be present in a tag name

Hello, currently, if I try to create a tag that has tilde "~" in name, an error is raised. E.g. $ git tag rpkg-util-1.4~rc1 fatal: 'rpkg-util-1.4~rc1' is not a valid tag name. Now, actually it would be very cool if tilde was allowed in a tag name because we would like to use it for tagging

Re: allow "~" to be present in a tag name

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <ava...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 13 2018, Michal Novotny jotted: > >> Hello, >> >> currently, if I try to create a tag that has tilde "~" in name, an >> error is raised. E.g. >&

Re: allow "~" to be present in a tag name

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 11:09 AM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <ava...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 13 2018, Michal Novotny jotted: > >> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason >> <ava...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue,

getting pull and push URLs for the current branch

Hello, is there a way to get remote url for the current branch? That is the url that will be used when I call `git pull`. It doesn't seem to be a particularly easy task. Thank you! clime

get commit ID from a tree object ID

Hello, let's say I have made an annotated tag on a certain treeish: $ git tag -a -m msg tagname HEAD: Now, I can try to see the content of the tag: $ git tag -v tagname object 42a1c36553a50ceae2f75ffc4b1446c6c393eae7 type tree tag tagname tagger clime 1521288727 +0100 msg

Re: with git 1.8.3.1 get only merged tags

On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 9:05 PM Jeff King wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 12:43:15PM +0200, Michal Novotny wrote: > > > I need to emulate git tag --merged with very old git 1.8.3.1. Is that > > somehow possible? > > I am looking for a bash function that would take

Re: with git 1.8.3.1 get only merged tags

On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 1:27 PM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 11 2018, Michal Novotny wrote: > > > I need to emulate git tag --merged with very old git 1.8.3.1. Is that > > somehow possible? > > I am looking for a bash function that would ta