Re: [PATCH 1/2] gitk: fr.po: Update translation (311t)

Thanks, applied both patches. Paul. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH v2] gitk: Fix missing commits when using -S or -G

On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 02:16:54PM +0200, Stefan Dotterweich wrote: > When -S or -G is used as a filter option, the resulting commit list > rarely contains all matching commits. Only a certain number of commits > are displayed and the rest are missing. > > "git log --boundary -S" does not return

Re: [PATCH] gitk: remove translated message from comments

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 07:52:45PM -0800, David Aguilar wrote: > "make update-po" fails because a previously untranslated string > has now been translated: > > Updating po/sv.po > po/sv.po:1388: duplicate message definition... > po/sv.po:380: ...this is the location of the first

Re: gitk: avoid obscene memory consumption

On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 11:28:37AM +0100, Markus Hitter wrote: > > Thanks for the positive comments. > > TBH, the more I think about the problem, the less I'm satisfied with the > solution I provided. Including two reasons: > > - The list of files affected to the right is still complete and

Re: gitk: avoid obscene memory consumption

On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 03:45:09PM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote: > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Markus Hitter wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > +cc Paul Mackeras, who maintains gitk. Thanks. > > > > after Gitk brought my shabby development machine (Core2Duo, 4 GB RAM, > >

Re: [PATCH 0/3] gitk: memory consumption improvements

On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 07:54:28PM +0100, Markus Hitter wrote: > > List, Paul, > > after searching for a while on why Gitk sometimes consumes exorbitant amounts > of memory I found a pair of minor issues and also a big one: the text widget > comes with an unlimited undo manager, which is

Re: Proposal for an increased `gitk` cohesion with `git stash`.

Hi Uxio, On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 03:41:29PM +0200, Uxío Prego wrote: > Hello, please forgive me for not introducing me. > > +---+ > |Description| > +---+ > > Patch for showing all stashes in `gitk`. > > +---+ > |The problem| > +---+ > > Being `gitk` one of the

Re: [PATCH] gitk: Fix Japanese translation for "marked commit"

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:35:10AM +0900, Satoshi Yasushima wrote: > Signed-off-by: Satoshi Yasushima > --- > po/ja.po | 9 + > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) Applied, thanks, Paul.

Re: [PATCH] Gitk Inotify support

On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 04:06:36PM +0200, Florian Schüller wrote: > >From 74d2f4c1ec560b358fb50b8b7fe8282e7e1457b0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: =?UTF-8?q?Florian=20Sch=C3=BCller?= > Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 22:54:43 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] first support for inotify

Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] gitk: Two improvements to the branch context menu

On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 07:31:32PM +0100, Rogier Goossens wrote: > Hi, > > Hereby the revised patches. > > Changes since v1: > - Rebased on latest master > - Made the changes you suggested > - Moved 'rename branch' menu option above 'delete branch' > - Cleaned up some code duplication that the

Re: [PATCH v3] gitk: Fix missing commits when using -S or -G

On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 10:47:16AM +0200, Stefan Dotterweich wrote: > When -S or -G is used as a filter option, the resulting commit list > rarely contains all matching commits. Only a certain number of commits > are displayed and the rest are missing. > > "git log --boundary -S" does not return

Re: [PATCH] gitk: Makefile: create install bin directory

On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 05:46:32PM +, Vasco Almeida wrote: > Force creation of destination bin directory. Before this commit, gitk > would fail to install if this directory didn't already exist. > > Signed-off-by: Vasco Almeida Thanks, applied (with slight tweak to

Re: [PATCH v4] gitk: Add Portuguese translation

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 08:01:33PM +, Vasco Almeida wrote: > Signed-off-by: Vasco Almeida > --- > > Oops, fix typo. Thanks, applied. Paul.

Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] gitk: alter the ordering for the "Tags and heads" view

On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 11:06:07AM -0400, Michael Rappazzo wrote: > In the "Tags and heads" view, the list of refs is globally sorted. > Because of this, the list of local refs (heads) can be interrupted by the > list of remote refs. This change re-orders the view to be: local refs, > remote refs

Re: [PATCH 2/6] Add ability to follow a remote branch with a dialog

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 09:58:43PM +1030, Pierre Dumuid wrote: > A suggested name is provided when creating a new "following" branch. > > Signed-off-by: Pierre Dumuid > --- > gitk | 86 > > 1 file changed,

Re: [PATCH 1/6] Enable ability to visualise the results of git cherry C1 C2

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 09:58:42PM +1030, Pierre Dumuid wrote: > It's a bit clunky but it works!! > > Usage: > - mark commit one (e.g. v45) > - Select commit two. > - Switch the gdttype to the option, "git-cherry between marked commit and:" This needs a better description. "Git-cherry

Re: [PATCH 3/6] Add a tree view to the local branches, remote branches and tags, where / is treated as a directory seperator.

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 09:58:44PM +1030, Pierre Dumuid wrote: > Signed-off-by: Pierre Dumuid > --- > gitk | 117 > +++ > 1 file changed, 117 insertions(+) Nice idea in general... a few comments below. Also,

Re: [PATCH 00/13] gitk: tweak rendering of remote-tracking references

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:01:15AM -0500, Marc Branchaud wrote: > On 2016-12-19 11:44 AM, Michael Haggerty wrote: > >This patch series changes a bunch of details about how remote-tracking > >references are rendered in the commit list of gitk: > > Thanks for this! I like the new, compact look

Re: gitk pull request // was: Re: gitk: "lime" color incompatible with older Tk versions

Hi Junio, On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 06:35:43PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > David Aguilar writes: > > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 03:20:43AM -0800, David Aguilar wrote: > >> > >> Ping.. it would be nice to get this patch applied. > > > > Sorry for the noise, and thank you Paul

<    1   2