On Mon, Jan 8, 2018, at 3:49 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 12:40 PM, Santiago Torres wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I personally like the idea of git-evtags, but I feel that they could be
> > made so that push certificates (and being hash-algorithm agnostic)
> >
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018, at 3:40 PM, Santiago Torres wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I personally like the idea of git-evtags, but I feel that they could be
> made so that push certificates (and being hash-algorithm agnostic)
> should provide the same functionality with less code.
What's a "push certificate"?
Hi, so quite a while ago I wrote this:
https://github.com/cgwalters/git-evtag
Since I last posted about this on the list here, of course
shattered.io happened. It also looks
like there was a node.js implementation written.
Any interest in having this in core git?
A while ago, I started a discussion on stronger verification of git
tags:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/264533
Since then I've been maintaining:
https://github.com/cgwalters/git-evtag
Which I think works well. At some point I'd like to discuss merging
some of the
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015, at 10:48 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
Hi,
TL;DR: Let's define a standard for embedding stronger checksums in tags and
commit messages:
https://github.com/cgwalters/homegit/blob/master/bin/git-evtag
[time passes]
I finally had a bit of time to pick this back up again
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015, at 03:34 PM, Morten Welinder wrote:
Is there a point to including a different checksum inside
a git tag? If someone can break the SHA-1 checksum
in the repository then the recorded SHA-256 checksum can
be changed. In other words, wouldn't you be just as well
off
Hi,
TL;DR: Let's define a standard for embedding stronger checksums in tags and
commit messages:
https://github.com/cgwalters/homegit/blob/master/bin/git-evtag
I think tarballs should go away as a source distribution mechanism in favor of
pure git. I won't go into too many details of the why
7 matches
Mail list logo