I tried your svn diff directly, and got the same error:
$ /usr/bin/time -v -o /tmp/svn-log svn diff -r7604:8870
https://ironpython.svn.codeplex.com/svn > /dev/null
svn: E000104: Error running context: Connection reset by peer
$ more /tmp/svn-log
Command exited with non-zero status 1
On
Fri, 13/5/16, Eric Wong <e...@80x24.org> wrote:
Hin-Tak Leung <ht...@users.sourceforge.net>
wrote:
> I tried bin-wrappers/ from
current git HEAD.
>
>
$ git describe
> v2.8.2-396-g5fe494c
> Which SVN vers
I tried bin-wrappers/ from current git HEAD.
$ git describe
v2.8.2-396-g5fe494c
bin-wrappers/git svn clone https://ironpython.svn.codeplex.com/svn
ironpython-old-codeplex
always fails at this rev:
M Src/Tests/test_re.py
r7605 = e581bc66eda2b86bf46681191034844c4ba7d7a5
Magnusson mika...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Hin-Tak Leung hintak.le...@gmail.com wrote:
Repost from another account. vger.kernel.org seems not
to like postings from my other alias (which goes through
yahoo).
(please cc - I am not a subscriber)
Recently I have started
by
requesting
less data.
ref: 1414636504.45506.yahoomailba...@web172304.mail.ir2.yahoo.com
ref: 1414722617.89476.yahoomailba...@web172305.mail.ir2.yahoo.com
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong normalper...@yhbt.net
Cc: Hin-Tak Leung ht...@users.sourceforge.net
---
This should fix the vbox clone problem
On Sat, 1/11/14, Eric Wong normalper...@yhbt.net wrote:
Hin-Tak Leung ht...@users.sourceforge.net
wrote:
While my 2.10 + 11 patches
continue to fetch, where it was stuck, now
it does Couldn't find
revmap... - also, the single branch clone
--
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 19:08 GMT Eric Wong wrote:
Eric Wong normalper...@yhbt.net wrote:
This avoids the following failure with normal get_dir on newer
versions of SVN (tested with SVN 1.8.8-1ubuntu3.1):
Incorrect parameters given: Could not convert '%ld'
to be more efficient by requesting
less data.
ref: 1414636504.45506.yahoomailba...@web172304.mail.ir2.yahoo.com
ref: 1414722617.89476.yahoomailba...@web172305.mail.ir2.yahoo.com
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong normalper...@yhbt.net
Cc: Hin-Tak Leung ht...@users.sourceforge.net
Tested-by: Hin-Tak Leung ht
On Sat, 1/11/14, Eric Wong normalper...@yhbt.net wrote:
Hin-Tak Leung ht...@users.sourceforge.net
wrote:
Tested-by: Hin-Tak Leung ht...@users.sourceforge.net
Okay, this one on
top of my git 2.1.0 + 10 recent git svn improvement
patches
--
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 08:46 GMT Eric Wong wrote:
Hin-Tak Leung ht...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Here is the data dumper info . I tried the dumper code on the R repo
as well, and saw that against the virtual box repo, there is one
curious difference - $self
(apology for the empty message again - sticky fingers in smart phone...)
--
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 08:46 GMT Eric Wong wrote:
Thanks, I'm not able to reproduce the issue, but can you try the
following?
diff --git a/perl/Git/SVN/Ra.pm b/perl/Git/SVN/Ra.pm
index
performance
To: Hin-Tak Leung ht...@users.sourceforge.net
Cc: stokl...@2pi.dk, fabian.schm...@gmail.com, git@vger.kernel.org,
s...@vilain.net, stevenrwal...@gmail.com, waste.mana...@gmx.de,
amyr...@apple.com
Date: Wednesday, 29 October, 2014, 20:23
Hin-Tak Leung ht...@users.sourceforge.net
wrote
On Thu, 30/10/14, Eric Wong normalper...@yhbt.net wrote:
The missing merge on branch
R-2-14-branch is:
commit
93af4d4cc3a5e0039944dd4e340d26995be8a252
Merge: 121990f 6ff1b87
Author: ripley ripley@00db46b3-68df-0310-9c12-caf00c1e9a41
Here is the data dumper info . I tried the dumper code on the R repo
as well, and saw that against the virtual box repo, there is one
curious difference - $self-{last_rev} is a string rather than a number.
I tried hacking around doing $x += 0; to coerce last_rev
to a number at various places but
Hi, I patched my system git with the recent git-svn improvements, and just use
it for general use; so theses are the patches, against 2.1.0.
0001-git-svn-only-look-at-the-new-parts-of-svn-mergeinfo.patch
0002-git-svn-only-look-at-the-root-path-for-svn-mergeinfo.patch
On Tue, 28/10/14, Eric Wong normalper...@yhbt.net wrote:
So both merges
are correct, but we lose one, and gain one?
I'll try to check more closely tomorrow.
Can you point out
the exact revisions in the
R repo? Thanks.
The missing merge on branch R-2-14-branch is:
commit
--
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 06:38 GMT Eric Wong wrote:
Which SVN version are you using? I'm cloning (currently on r373xx)
https://svn.r-project.org/R using --stdlayout and
unable to see memory growth of the git-svn Perl process beyond 40M
(on a 32-bit system).
I also
--
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 16:56 GMT Eric Wong wrote:
Eric Wong normalper...@yhbt.net wrote:
Which SVN version are you using? I'm cloning (currently on r373xx)
https://svn.r-project.org/R using --stdlayout and
unable to see memory growth of the git-svn Perl process
To compare the old clone with the new, I did:
git branch -r | sort | xargs -n 1 git log --decorate=full -n 1
It turned out other than the empty vs 3 word commit messages
about two years ago on trunk (which are inherited in all the newer
branches), there are two other groups of differences.
One
On Sat, 25/10/14, Eric Wong normalper...@yhbt.net wrote:
Probably an SVN hook preventing it. git-svn
test cases such as
t/t9118-git-svn-funky-branch-names.sh do single
word commits.
Thanks - I see indeed - at least that clears that up.
--
To
--
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 01:02 BST Eric Wong wrote:
Hin-Tak Leung ht...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Comparing trunk of old and new, I see one difference - One short
commit message is missing in the *old* (the Add checkPoFiles etc. part)
and so all the sha1
--
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 00:34 BST Eric Wong wrote:
Hin-Tak Leung ht...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
I keep tabs of a particular svn repository over many years
and run git svn fetch --all every few days. So that's the old clone.
Since this discussion started, I
--
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 06:32 BST Eric Wong wrote:
Hin-Tak Leung ht...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
the old didn't missing a revision - just a revision 'message' - blank
instead of 3 words, above the git svn id. I supppse it is possible
some power problem or etc
I keep tabs of a particular svn repository over many years
and run git svn fetch --all every few days. So that's the old clone.
Since this discussion started, I made a new one with git 2.1.0 patched
with the first two patches below, a couple of weeks ago. And I ran
'git svn fetch --all' on both
memory usage from the new mergeinfo
speedups without hurting performance too much, assuming
reasonable latency to the SVN server.
Cc: Hin-Tak Leung ht...@users.sourceforge.net
Suggested-by: Jakob Stoklund Olesen stokl...@2pi.dk
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong normalper...@yhbt.net
---
perl/Git/SVN.pm
--
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 05:12 BST Eric Wong wrote:
Hin-Tak Leung ht...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
The new clone has:
--
$ ls -ltr .git/svn/.caches/
total 144788
-rw-rw-r--. 1 Hin-Tak Hin-Tak 1166138 Oct 7 13:44 lookup_svn_merge.yaml
-rw-rw-r--. 1 Hin
(sorry about the last blank reply - mobile phone and finger accident...)
--
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 05:12 BST Eric Wong wrote:
Hin-Tak Leung ht...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
The new clone has:
--
$ ls -ltr .git/svn/.caches/
total 144788
-rw-rw-r--. 1 Hin-Tak Hin
--
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 00:51 BST Hin-Tak Leung wrote:
--
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 02:02 BST Eric Wong wrote:
snipped
Hin-Tak: have you tried Jakob's patches? I've taken another look,
signed-off and pushed to my master.
... Then
I changed my
--
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 02:02 BST Eric Wong wrote:
Eric Wong normalper...@yhbt.net wrote:
Jakob sent some patches a few months ago which seem to address the
issue. Unfortunately we forgot about them :x
Hin-Tak: have you tried Jakob's patches? I've taken another
(I am not on the list - please CC)
Thanks for git-svn - I use it instead of subversion itself for many years now.
Just thought I'd ask/report a few issues I noticed for some time
now, of tracking development of a particular subversion-based
development project. Broadly speaking, I think there
(I have already worked around the issue, but just would like to report
it and perhaps discuss - please cc'd as I am not subscribed).
I noticed one or two most recent commits I made a few days ago is not around,
so I thought I have mis-remembered it or forgot to do 'git add' (it was adding
some
31 matches
Mail list logo
