That doesn't make sense. If you are the owner of the file, why do you need
sudo???
I've just never seen a chmod command without sudo. I assumed it was
needed. Is this relevant to the bug that I'm seeing?
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 5:40 AM, Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
Justin
, it wasn't happening in 32b.
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Justin Collum jcol...@gmail.com wrote:
That doesn't make sense. If you are the owner of the file, why do you need
sudo???
I've just never seen a chmod command without sudo. I assumed it was
needed. Is this relevant to the bug that I'm
I've run into a strange situation with git lately. It seems that
anything I do involving git will alter the permissions on my index
file to the point that I can't do anything until I re-add the
permissions on the file.
Looks like a bug to me, is it? It does seem like this has started
happening
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Andrew Ruder a...@aeruder.net wrote:
he is neither the user dev or the group dev
I am both. There's only one user on this machine and he is me.
he is regularly running chmod -R 777
Yes, true. I have a program that I use to edit some of these files
(not the git
, 2013 at 11:35:35PM +0200, Stefan Beller wrote:
On 08/08/2013 10:27 PM, Justin Collum wrote:
[...]
-rwxrwxrwx 1 dev dev 17K Aug 8 13:12 index
[...]
-rw-rw-r-- 1 dev dev 17K Aug 8 13:16 index # ---
The permissions are set to reading for all and writing for you(r user
5 matches
Mail list logo
