Re: [RFC] undo and redo

On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 02:37:33PM -0600, Carl Baldwin wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 02:59:18PM -0500, Kirby C. Bohling wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 10:32:01AM -0600, Carl Baldwin wrote: > > > > > Another example is if I'm working on a commit and suddenly g

Re: [RFC] undo and redo

On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 01:19:05PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > "Kirby C. Bohling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I guess my final question is what does undo/redo have over saving > > stuff away in a patch assuming that the patch captures all of the >

Re: [RFC] undo and redo

On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 10:32:01AM -0600, Carl Baldwin wrote: > Another example is if I'm working on a commit and suddenly get a > brilliant idea for some easy modification that I want to make and commit > by itself before making this commit. I can do this easily with > > % git undo >

Re: [OT?] git tools at SourceForge ?

On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 04:46:34PM -0400, Daniel Barkalow wrote: > On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > > This is somewhat off topic here, so I apologize, but I didn't know > > any better place to ask: > > > > Has anybody any information if SourceForge is going to provide git / > > c

Re: [PATCH/RFC] "Recursive Make considered harmful"

On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 10:25:10AM -0400, A Large Angry SCM wrote: > Ryan Anderson wrote: > >Convert build process from recurse Make to a single Make > > > > Please explain the rational for this. I'm new to the list, but given the subject, I'm fairly confident it's this. http://www.canb.auug.org