> -Original Message-
> From: git-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:git-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On
>
> But ultimately, there shouldn't be a question of "if" you
> have a master repository but "where" you have the master repository, correct?
> Or in other words, it doesn't seem like you'd want
From: git-ow...@vger.kernel.org [git-ow...@vger.kernel.org] on behalf of Lang,
David [david.l...@uhn.ca]
> I thought the idea was that each developer installed git locally on their
> machines
Yes.
> and (as needed) committed their changes to the master repository which
> resides externally t
"David Lang" wrote in message
news:...
> >>
> >> On Thu, 17 Jan 2013, Matt Seitz (matseitz) wrote:
> >>
> >>> 2. a repository where only one user does "git add" and "git commit",
> >> while other users will do &
> From: David Lang [mailto:da...@lang.hm]
>
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2013, Matt Seitz (matseitz) wrote:
>
> > 1. a bare repository that is normally accessed only by "git push" and
> > "git pull" (or "git fetch"), the central repository model.
&g
> From: David Lang [mailto:da...@lang.hm]
>
> Linus says that git does not have "proper locking", so think about it,
> what do
> you think will happen if person A does git add a/b; git commit and person
> B does
> git add c/d; git commit?
Sorry, I wasn't clear. My assumption is that a shared repo
> From: David Lang [mailto:da...@lang.hm]
>
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2013, Matt Seitz (matseitz) wrote:
>
> > Linus seemed to think it should work:
> >
> > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/122670
>
> In the link you point at, he says that you
"David Lang" wrote in message
news:...
> But if you try to have one filesystem, with multiple people running git on
> their
> machines against that shared filesystem, I would expect you to have all sorts
> of
> problems.
What leads you to think you will have problems?
Why would there be mor
"Konstantin Khomoutov" wrote in message
news:<20130116233744.7d0775eaec98ce154a9de...@domain007.com>...
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:21:56 -0800
> Jeff King wrote:
> >
> > I agree that performance is not ideal (although if you are on a fast
> > LAN, it probably would not matter much), but I do not
"Jeff King" wrote in message
news:<2013085417.ga12...@sigill.intra.peff.net>...
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:43:39AM -0800, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
>
>
> > How about "What Message-ID to use as In-Reply-To for the first email?"
> > or "Provide the Message-ID to use as In-Reply-To for the first
9 matches
Mail list logo
