Jonathan Nieder-2 wrote
Is the [transfer] fsckObjects configuration on the host executing the
clone set to true?
I hadn't been setting it at all, and according to git-config(1) it defaults
to false, so the answer is no. It looks like setting it might be a good
idea.
But I'm still somewhat
Junio C Hamano wrote
If you use --local, that is equivalent to cp -R. Your corruption
in the source will faithfully be byte-for-byte copied to the
destination. If you do not
...
transport layer will notice
object corruption.
...
The difference between --mirror and no --mirror is a red
Jeff King wrote
Fundamentally the problem is
that the --local transport is not safe from propagating corruption, and
should not be used if that's a requirement.
I've read Jeff Mitchell's blog post, his update, relevant parts of the
git-clone(1) man page, and a decent chunk of this thread, and
3 matches
Mail list logo
