On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Ronnie Sahlberg sahlb...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:
Wrap all the ref updates inside a transaction to make the update atomic.
Interesting.
[...]
---
Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:
Wrap all the ref updates inside a transaction to make the update atomic.
Interesting.
[...]
--- a/builtin/receive-pack.c
+++ b/builtin/receive-pack.c
@@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ static void *head_name_to_free;
static int sent_capabilities;
static int shallow_update;
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:
Wrap all the ref updates inside a transaction to make the update atomic.
Interesting.
[...]
--- a/builtin/receive-pack.c
+++ b/builtin/receive-pack.c
@@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ static void
Wrap all the ref updates inside a transaction to make the update atomic.
Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg sahlb...@google.com
---
builtin/receive-pack.c | 20 ++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin/receive-pack.c b/builtin/receive-pack.c
index
4 matches
Mail list logo