Paul Gortmaker paul.gortma...@windriver.com writes:
TL;DR -- git apply --reject implies verbose, but the similar
git apply --check does not, which seems inconsistent.
Hmmm, I am of two minds. From purely idealistic point of view, I
can see why defaulting both to non-verbose may look a more
On 13-08-20 01:57 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Paul Gortmaker paul.gortma...@windriver.com writes:
TL;DR -- git apply --reject implies verbose, but the similar
git apply --check does not, which seems inconsistent.
Hmmm, I am of two minds. From purely idealistic point of view, I
can see why
Hi Paul,
Paul Gortmaker wrote:
OK, so given your feedback, how do you feel about a patch to the
documentation that indicates to use -v in combination with the
--check to get equivalent patch --dry-run behaviour?
Sounds like a good idea to me.
I assume you mean a note in the OPTIONS or
Paul Gortmaker paul.gortma...@windriver.com writes:
OK, so given your feedback, how do you feel about a patch to the
documentation that indicates to use -v in combination with the
--check to get equivalent patch --dry-run behaviour? If that
had existed, I'd have not gone rummaging around in
On 13-08-20 02:51 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Hi Paul,
Paul Gortmaker wrote:
OK, so given your feedback, how do you feel about a patch to the
documentation that indicates to use -v in combination with the
--check to get equivalent patch --dry-run behaviour?
Sounds like a good idea to
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 12:07:18 -0700
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Paul Gortmaker paul.gortma...@windriver.com writes:
OK, so given your feedback, how do you feel about a patch to the
documentation that indicates to use -v in combination with the
--check to get equivalent patch
Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org writes:
I do not think it is necessarily a good idea to assume that people
who are learning git apply know how GNU patch works.
Linus told me that git apply was basically a replacement for patch.
Why would you think it would not be a good idea to assume
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 12:45:03 -0700
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org writes:
I do not think it is necessarily a good idea to assume that people
who are learning git apply know how GNU patch works.
Linus told me that git apply was basically a
Paul Gortmaker paul.gortma...@windriver.com writes:
Looks good to me. Paul, what do you think?
Yep, I'll write something up tomorrow which loosely matches the above.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org writes:
Linus told me that git apply was basically a replacement for patch.
Why would you think it would not be a good idea to assume that people
would not be familiar with how GNU patch works?
The audience of Git these days are far more widely spread
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 14:43:56 -0700
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
But only folks in the kernel circle will be told by Linus the
similarity between apply and patch, no?
Well, there was a time when Linus was making his rounds showcasing git
more than Linux, to people that were not
On 13-08-20 03:54 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 12:45:03 -0700
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org writes:
I do not think it is necessarily a good idea to assume that people
who are learning git apply know how GNU patch works.
Linus
12 matches
Mail list logo
