Johan Herland jo...@herland.net writes:
Of course in either case we couldn't use a tree object directly, because
these new reference tree objects would refer not only to blobs and
other trees but also to commits and tags.
Indeed. I don't know if the best solution would be to actually _allow_
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Johan Herland jo...@herland.net writes:
Of course in either case we couldn't use a tree object directly, because
these new reference tree objects would refer not only to blobs and
other trees but also to commits and
Johan Herland jo...@herland.net writes:
I wasn't considering disallowing _anything_, rather open up to the
idea that a tree object might refer to tag objects as well as
commits/trees/blobs. E.g. in my suggested-but-pretty-much-retracted
scheme, I was considering whether the tree entry at the
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Johan Herland jo...@herland.net writes:
I wasn't considering disallowing _anything_, rather open up to the
idea that a tree object might refer to tag objects as well as
commits/trees/blobs. E.g. in my
4 matches
Mail list logo
