On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
To ensure that all depths start at 0, that commit changed
calls to xmalloc the object_entry list into calls to
xcalloc. However, it forgot that we grow the list with
xrealloc later. These extra entries are used when we add an
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 03:12:07PM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
To ensure that all depths start at 0, that commit changed
calls to xmalloc the object_entry list into calls to
xcalloc. However, it forgot that we grow the list
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 03:12:07PM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
To ensure that all depths start at 0, that commit changed
calls to xmalloc the object_entry list
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:52:44AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
Commit 38a4556 (index-pack: start learning to emulate
verify-pack -v, 2011-06-03) added a delta_depth counter
to each struct object_entry. Initially, all object entries
have their depth
Thomas Rast tr...@student.ethz.ch writes:
It apparently relates to the use of .idx.offset to compute the next
offset, cf. append_obj_to_pack():
struct object_entry *obj = objects[nr_objects++];
...
obj[1].idx.offset = obj[0].idx.offset + n;
obj[1].idx.offset +=
5 matches
Mail list logo
