Re: [BUG] Move tracking in git diff is not as good as in git status

2015-02-05 Thread Junio C Hamano
Kyle J. McKay mack...@gmail.com writes: On Feb 4, 2015, at 22:11, Scott Schmit wrote: In my use of git, I've noticed that git status is a lot better at tracking moves and renames than git diff, and this has recently caused me a lot of headaches because a large number of moves were made in a

[BUG] Move tracking in git diff is not as good as in git status

2015-02-04 Thread Scott Schmit
In my use of git, I've noticed that git status is a lot better at tracking moves and renames than git diff, and this has recently caused me a lot of headaches because a large number of moves were made in a single commit, and it was very difficult to figure out which moves were right and which were

Re: [BUG] Move tracking in git diff is not as good as in git status

2015-02-04 Thread Kyle J. McKay
On Feb 4, 2015, at 22:11, Scott Schmit wrote: In my use of git, I've noticed that git status is a lot better at tracking moves and renames than git diff, and this has recently caused me a lot of headaches because a large number of moves were made in a single commit, and it was very difficult