Re: [GSoC] Update: Week 5

2017-06-26 Thread Prathamesh Chavan
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 5:31 AM, Andrew Ardill wrote: > On 20 June 2017 at 07:41, Prathamesh Chavan wrote: > >>But as communicating between child_process is still an issue >>and so there was no simple was to current carry out the >>porting.

Re: [GSoC] Update: Week 5

2017-06-19 Thread Brandon Williams
On 06/20, Andrew Ardill wrote: > On 20 June 2017 at 07:41, Prathamesh Chavan wrote: > > >But as communicating between child_process is still an issue > >and so there was no simple was to current carry out the > >porting. And hence, a hack was used instead. But

Re: [GSoC] Update: Week 5

2017-06-19 Thread Andrew Ardill
On 20 June 2017 at 07:41, Prathamesh Chavan wrote: >But as communicating between child_process is still an issue >and so there was no simple was to current carry out the >porting. And hence, a hack was used instead. But after >discussing it, instead using the

[GSoC] Update: Week 5

2017-06-19 Thread Prathamesh Chavan
SUMMARY OF MY PROJECT: Git submodule subcommands are currently implemented by using shell script 'git-submodule.sh'. There are several reasons why we'll prefer not to use the shell script. My project intends to convert the subcommands into C code, thus making them builtins. This will increase

[GSOC Update] Week 5

2016-06-06 Thread Pranit Bauva
= SUMMARY == My public git.git is available here[1]. I regularly keep pushing my work so anyone interested can track me there. Feel free to participate in the discussions going on PRs with my mentors. Your comments are valuable.