On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 01:02:56PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Jeff King writes:
>
> > As Junio and I discussed earlier in [1], this series makes the
> > prio_queue struct stable with respect to object insertion (which in turn
> > means we can use it to replace commit_list in more places).
>
Jeff King writes:
> As Junio and I discussed earlier in [1], this series makes the
> prio_queue struct stable with respect to object insertion (which in turn
> means we can use it to replace commit_list in more places).
I don't think that this makes sense in general since it assumes the
appropri
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> As Junio and I discussed earlier in [1], this series makes the
> prio_queue struct stable with respect to object insertion (which in turn
> means we can use it to replace commit_list in more places).
>
> I think everything here is correct, but t
As Junio and I discussed earlier in [1], this series makes the
prio_queue struct stable with respect to object insertion (which in turn
means we can use it to replace commit_list in more places).
I think everything here is correct, but the second commit fails the
final test in t5539. I think the t
4 matches
Mail list logo
