On 25/10/16 22:41, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Aaron M Watson writes:
>
> Aaron M Watson writes:
>
>> Instead of referencing "stash@{n}" explicitly, it can simply be
>> referenced as "n".
>> Most users only reference stashes by their position
>> in the
Aaron M Watson writes:
Aaron M Watson writes:
> Instead of referencing "stash@{n}" explicitly, it can simply be
> referenced as "n".
> Most users only reference stashes by their position
> in the stash stask (what I refer to as the "index").
It is
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:11 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 07:40:13PM -0400, Aaron M Watson wrote:
>
>> Instead of referencing "stash@{n}" explicitly, it can simply be
>> referenced as "n". Most users only reference stashes by their position
>> in the stash stask
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 07:40:13PM -0400, Aaron M Watson wrote:
> Instead of referencing "stash@{n}" explicitly, it can simply be
> referenced as "n". Most users only reference stashes by their position
> in the stash stask (what I refer to as the "index"). The syntax for the
> typical stash
Instead of referencing "stash@{n}" explicitly, it can simply be
referenced as "n". Most users only reference stashes by their position
in the stash stask (what I refer to as the "index"). The syntax for the
typical stash (stash@{n}) is slightly annoying and easy to forget, and
sometimes difficult
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 01:41:25PM -0400, Aaron and Ashley Watson wrote:
> > But what's going on here? Why did we bother running rev-parse earlier if
> > we don't actually use the value of REV?
> >
> > You mentioned tweaking it to fix a broken test, and indeed, just using
> > $REV here breaks a
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 07:46:37PM -0400, Aaron M Watson wrote:
> Instead of referencing "stash@{n}" explicitly, it can simply be
> referenced as "n". Most users only reference stashes by their position
> in the stash stask (what I refer to as the "index"). The syntax for the
> typical stash
Instead of referencing "stash@{n}" explicitly, it can simply be
referenced as "n". Most users only reference stashes by their position
in the stash stask (what I refer to as the "index"). The syntax for the
typical stash (stash@{n}) is slightly annoying and easy to forget, and
sometimes difficult
8 matches
Mail list logo