On 09.07.2012, at 16:50, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Max Horn m...@quendi.de writes:
The configure script checks whether certain flags / libraries are
required to use pthreads. But so far it did not consider the possibility
that no extra compiler flags are needed (as is the case on Mac OS X). As
Max Horn m...@quendi.de writes:
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 4e9012f..d767ef3 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -1002,7 +1002,7 @@ if test -n $USER_NOPTHREAD; then
# -D_REENTRANT' or some such.
elif test -z $PTHREAD_CFLAGS; then
threads_found=no
- for
On 09.07.2012, at 19:44, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Max Horn m...@quendi.de writes:
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 4e9012f..d767ef3 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -1002,7 +1002,7 @@ if test -n $USER_NOPTHREAD; then
# -D_REENTRANT' or some such.
elif test -z
Max Horn m...@quendi.de writes:
would it be feasible for the purpose of
the check to tweak the definition of works used in the loop so that
it considers the warning as not working?
That would be possible, and probably a good idea. But it is also
completely orthogonal to my patch. Indeed, if
On 09.07.2012, at 21:23, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Max Horn m...@quendi.de writes:
would it be feasible for the purpose of
the check to tweak the definition of works used in the loop so that
it considers the warning as not working?
That would be possible, and probably a good idea. But it is
Max Horn m...@quendi.de writes:
But all in all, I don't understand why this order independence
seems to be so important?
Not so important as long as it is made clear for later people to
patch that part of the code. I just wanted to make sure that
somebody thought hard enough to judge that it
6 matches
Mail list logo
