On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com writes:
+action = noop / ls-remote / fetch / push /
fetch-shallow
...
If we are going in this in-protocol message switches the service
route, we should also support archive
Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com writes:
This adds the design document for protocol version 2.
It's better to rewrite the design document instead of trying to
squash it into the existing pack-protocol.txt and then differentiating
between version 1 and 2 all the time.
Just a handful of random
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com writes:
This adds the design document for protocol version 2.
It's better to rewrite the design document instead of trying to
squash it into the existing pack-protocol.txt and then
Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com writes:
+action = noop / ls-remote / fetch / push /
fetch-shallow
...
If we are going in this in-protocol message switches the service
route, we should also support archive as one of the actions, no?
Yes, I know you named the document
This adds the design document for protocol version 2.
It's better to rewrite the design document instead of trying to
squash it into the existing pack-protocol.txt and then differentiating
between version 1 and 2 all the time.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com
---
As we
5 matches
Mail list logo
