Re: [PATCH] Use "working tree" instead of "working directory" for git status

Matthieu Moy writes: > Lars Vogel writes: > >> --- a/wt-status.c >> +++ b/wt-status.c >> @@ -1554,7 +1554,7 @@ void wt_status_print(struct wt_status *s) >> else >> printf(_("nothing to

Re: [PATCH] Use "working tree" instead of "working directory" for git status

Lars Vogel writes: > --- a/wt-status.c > +++ b/wt-status.c > @@ -1554,7 +1554,7 @@ void wt_status_print(struct wt_status *s) > else > printf(_("nothing to commit\n")); > } else > -

Re: [PATCH] Use "working tree" instead of "working directory" for git status

Thanks updated patch on its way. On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 7:55 PM, Eric Sunshine wrote: > On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Lars Vogel wrote: >> Working directory can be easily confused with the current directory. >> In one of my patches I already

[PATCH] Use "working tree" instead of "working directory" for git status

Working directory can be easily confused with the current directory. In one of my patches I already updated the usage of working directory with working tree for the man page but I noticed that git status also uses this incorrect term. Signed-off-by: Lars Vogel ---

Re: [PATCH] Use "working tree" instead of "working directory" for git status

On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Lars Vogel wrote: > Working directory can be easily confused with the current directory. > In one of my patches I already updated the usage of working directory > with working tree for the man page but I noticed that git status also > uses

[PATCH] Use "working tree" instead of "working directory" for git status

Working directory can be easily confused with the current directory. In one of my patches I already updated the usage of working directory with working tree for the man page but I noticed that git status also uses this incorrect term. --- po/bg.po| 2 +- po/ca.po| 2 +- po/de.po| 2 +-