ok, will drop the patch due to bad design.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Stefan Beller wrote:
>>
>>> If we don't pass in the error string buffer, we skip over all
>>> parts dealing with preparing error messa
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Stefan Beller wrote:
>
>> If we don't pass in the error string buffer, we skip over all
>> parts dealing with preparing error messages.
>
> Please no.
>
> We tried this with the ref transaction code. When someone wants
> to silence the me
Stefan Beller wrote:
> If we don't pass in the error string buffer, we skip over all
> parts dealing with preparing error messages.
Please no.
We tried this with the ref transaction code. When someone wants
to silence the message, it is cheap enough to do
struct strbuf ignore = STRBUF_
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Stefan Beller wrote:
> If we don't pass in the error string buffer, we skip over all
> parts dealing with preparing error messages.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller
> ---
>
> This goes ontop of [PATCH v5] refs.c: use a stringlist for repack_without_refs
> if that
If we don't pass in the error string buffer, we skip over all
parts dealing with preparing error messages.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller
---
This goes ontop of [PATCH v5] refs.c: use a stringlist for repack_without_refs
if that makes sense.
refs.c | 8
refs.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 4
5 matches
Mail list logo
