Johannes Schindelin writes:
>> I suppose that if the condition is fulfilled then the previously
>> obtained value will not be necessary.
>
> I have to be honest: this commit message (including the subject) left me
> quite puzzled as to the intent of this patch.
>
>
On Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 8:35 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 24 2017, Kevin Daudt jotted:
>
>> On Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 12:15:35PM +0400, Vadim Petrov wrote:
>>> Thank you for your replay.
>>>
>>> > I have to be honest: this commit message (including the
On Sun, Dec 24 2017, Kevin Daudt jotted:
> On Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 12:15:35PM +0400, Vadim Petrov wrote:
>> Thank you for your replay.
>>
>> > I have to be honest: this commit message (including the subject) left me
>> > quite puzzled as to the intent of this patch.
>>
>> I still only learn
On Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 12:15:35PM +0400, Vadim Petrov wrote:
> Thank you for your replay.
>
> > I have to be honest: this commit message (including the subject) left me
> > quite puzzled as to the intent of this patch.
>
> I still only learn English and correctly express my thoughts while
Thank you for your replay.
> I have to be honest: this commit message (including the subject) left me
> quite puzzled as to the intent of this patch.
I still only learn English and correctly express my thoughts while somewhat
difficult.
> If you also have a background story that motivated you
Hi Vadim,
thank you for your contribution!
On Sun, 24 Dec 2017, Vadim Petrov wrote:
> I suppose that if the condition is fulfilled then the previously
> obtained value will not be necessary.
I have to be honest: this commit message (including the subject) left me
quite puzzled as to the intent
I suppose that if the condition is fulfilled then the previously
obtained value will not be necessary.
Signed-off-by: Vadim Petrov
---
setup.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/setup.c b/setup.c
index 8cc34186c..1ce0189fa 100644
---
7 matches
Mail list logo