Ramsay Jones writes:
>> I thought I had this in yesterdays reroll (v6). Oh you're referring to
>> the version
>> from the 28th (I forgot to label them v5 I suppose).
>
> Ah! I thought I'd seen it on the list. (I thought I was going crazy) ;-)
> Sorry, my fault. I
Commits 0fc1fdb0 ("fetch_populated_submodules: use new parallel job
processing", 28-09-2015) and 60f24f52 ("run-command: add an asynchronous
parallel child processor", 28-09-2015) both introduce external symbols
which only require file scope visibility. In order to reduce the
visibility, apply
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 5:02 AM, Ramsay Jones
wrote:
>
> Commits 0fc1fdb0 ("fetch_populated_submodules: use new parallel job
> processing", 28-09-2015) and 60f24f52 ("run-command: add an asynchronous
> parallel child processor", 28-09-2015) both introduce external
On 01/10/15 18:05, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 5:02 AM, Ramsay Jones
> wrote:
>>
[snip]
>> diff --git a/run-command.c b/run-command.c
>> index 341b23b..347d22e 100644
>> --- a/run-command.c
>> +++ b/run-command.c
>> @@ -865,7 +865,7 @@ int
Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones
---
Hi Stefan,
When you next re-roll the patches for your
'sb/submodule-parallel-fetch' branch, could you please squash
parts of this into the relevant patches. [which would correspond
to commits a93fb7a ("run-command: add an
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Ramsay Jones
wrote:
> [Note these issues were spotted by sparse and static-check.pl]
Any chance you got a link to docs about static-check.pl? I've never
heard of this...
Regards,
Jake
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
6 matches
Mail list logo