Re: [PATCH 0/2] Move sequencer

2013-06-08 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 10:35 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra artag...@gmail.com wrote: Felipe Contreras wrote: sequencer.c = builtin/sequencer.c | 160 +--- sequencer.h = builtin/sequencer.h | 4 - Why exactly? The plan was to unify continuation semantics, and

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Move sequencer

2013-06-07 Thread Ramkumar Ramachandra
Felipe Contreras wrote: sequencer.c = builtin/sequencer.c | 160 +--- sequencer.h = builtin/sequencer.h | 4 - Why exactly? The plan was to unify continuation semantics, and get all the continuation-commands to use the sequencer. That clearly hasn't